1993
DOI: 10.1192/s0007125000292210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TAPS Project. 9: The Reliability of the Patient Attitude Questionnaire

Abstract: The development of the hospital and community versions of the Patient Attitude Questionnaire is described. The instrument rates the attitudes of psychiatric patients towards their treatment settings and staff, and is framed specifically to assess attitudinal change during the transfer of patients from hospital. For the items rated using the kappa coefficient of agreement, the mean test-retest reliability value was 0.51, and the average inter-rater value was 0.82. This study shows that long-term psychiatric pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two key instruments used in the study were the Patient Attitude Questionnaire (PAQ) (Thornicroft et al . 1993) and the Manchester Short Assessment for the Quality of Life (MANSA) (Priebe et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two key instruments used in the study were the Patient Attitude Questionnaire (PAQ) (Thornicroft et al . 1993) and the Manchester Short Assessment for the Quality of Life (MANSA) (Priebe et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with the patients' physical health and treatments given were recorded with the Physical Health Index (PHI) from information in the case notes and from interviews with the care staff. Patients' attitudes to the care received and to the care environment were ascertained with the Patient Attitude Questionnaire (PAQ) (Thornicroft et al , 1993). The degree of restrictiveness of the patients' living situation was measured with the Environmental Index (EI) while the extent and quality of their social networks were assessed with the Social Network Schedule (SNS, Leff et al , 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face validity was addressed by sampling the views of all design group participants about instrument content and design, and reviewing related studies and instruments (e.g. Lesage et al 1991 ;Thornicroft et al 1993 ;Phelan et al 1995 ;Bebbington et al 1996).…”
Section: Instrument : the Perceived Need For Care Questionnaire (Pncq)mentioning
confidence: 99%