2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-014-0557-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tate conjecture for K3 surfaces in odd characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For non-supersingular K3 surfaces in characteristic p > 5, the Tate conjecture was proved by Nygaard and Ogus in 1985 [34]. Finally, the supersingular case was proved in a series of papers starting in 2012 by Charles, Kim, Madapusi Pera, and Maulik [7,20,26,27]. The case of characteristic 2 was proved only in the last of these papers, by Kim and Madapusi Pera.…”
Section: Further Results Over Finite Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-supersingular K3 surfaces in characteristic p > 5, the Tate conjecture was proved by Nygaard and Ogus in 1985 [34]. Finally, the supersingular case was proved in a series of papers starting in 2012 by Charles, Kim, Madapusi Pera, and Maulik [7,20,26,27]. The case of characteristic 2 was proved only in the last of these papers, by Kim and Madapusi Pera.…”
Section: Further Results Over Finite Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[DP94,KR99]. Moreover, there is work in progress by Kisin and Pappas, which will generalize the methods of [Kis10] to construct integral models of Shimura varieties of abelian type with general parahoric level at p. However, the simple and direct nature of our construction seems to be quite useful in applications, which include the Tate conjecture for K3 surfaces in odd characteristic [MaP14], and also forthcoming work, in collaboration with F. Andreatta, E. Goren and B. Howard, on the arithmetic intersection theory over these Shimura varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in §2.2, this has been confirmed for all known examples except OG6. [48] has dealt with the case of K3 surfaces in adelic language (see also [38,33]), but there is no difficulty to extend his construction to hyperkähler manifolds, see e.g. [16, §3.3].…”
Section: Denote Bymentioning
confidence: 99%