The taxonomic distinctness of macroinvertebrate communities of Atlantic Forest streams cannot be predicted by landscape and climate variables, but traditional biodiversity indices can

Abstract

Predicting how anthropogenic activities may influence the various components of biodiversity is essential for finding ways to reduce diversity loss. This challenge involves: a) understanding how environmental factors influence diversity across different spatial scales, and b) developing ways to measure these relationships in a way that is fast, economical, and easy to communicate. In this study, we investigate whether landscape and bioclimatic variables could explain variation in biodiversity indices in macroinvertebrate communities from 39 Atlantic Forest streams. In addition to traditional diversity measures, i.e., species richness, abundance and Shannon index, we used a taxonomic distinctness index that measures the degree of phylogenetic relationship among taxa. The amount of variation in the diversity measures that was explained by environmental and spatial variables was estimated using variation partitioning based on multiple regression. Our study demonstrates that taxonomic distinctness does not respond in the same way as the traditional used in biodiversity studies. We found no evidence that taxonomic distinctness responds predictably to variation in landscape metrics, indicating the need for the incorporation of predictors at multiple scales in this type of study. The lack of congruence between taxonomic distinctness and other indices and its low predictability may be related to the fact that this measure expresses long-term evolutionary adaptation to ecosystem conditions, while the other traditional biodiversity metrics respond to short-term environmental changes.Keywords: biomonitoring, diversity indices, spatial structure, taxonomic diversity. A distinção taxonômica de comunidades de macroinvertebrados de córregos da Mata Atlântica não pode ser previsto pela paisagem e por variáveis climáticas, mas os índices de biodiversidade tradicional podem ResumoPrever como as atividades antrópicas podem influenciar os vários componentes da biodiversidade é essencial para encontrar maneiras de reduzir a perda de diversidade. Este desafio envolve: a) a compreensão de como os fatores ambientais influenciam a diversidade em diferentes escalas espaciais e, b) desenvolver formas de medir essas relações de uma maneira rápida, econômica e de fácil comunicação. Neste estudo, nós investigamos se a paisagem e as variáveis bioclimáticas podem explicar a variação nos índices de biodiversidade em comunidades de macroinvertebrados de 39 riachos de Mata Atlântica. Adicionalmente às medidas tradicionais de diversidade, por ex.: riqueza de espécies, abundância e índice de Shannon, nos utilizamos índice de distinção taxonômica que mede o grau de relação filogenética dentre os taxa. A quantidade de variação nas medidas de diversidade que foi explicado por variáveis ambientais e espaciais foi estimada utilizando a variação particionada baseada em regressão múltipla. O presente estudo demonstraBraz.

Taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of leeches (Hirudinea) and their suitability in biological assessment of environmental quality

“…Charvet et al (2000), Usseglio-Polatera et al (2000), and Gayraud et al (2003) indicate the enhanced usefulness of functional diversity in the biological assessment of different European watercourses when compared with other measures of diversity of benthic animals. Roque et al (2014) found noticeable differences between traditional diversity measures and distinctness in prediction abilities to different environmental variables. This lack of congruence may be related to the fact that distinctness expresses long-term evolutionary adaptation to ecosystem conditions, while the other traditional biodiversity metrics respond to short-term environmental changes.…”

Environmental quality of a stream can be better predicted by phylogenetic than by taxonomic diversity

“…It should be emphasized that the lack of strong relationship between PD and most of the analysed environmental factors may be the result of great divergence of analysed environments, which belonged probably to different categories in terms of their biotic and abiotic parameters Roque et al, 2014). The methodology used in present paper, based on independent analysis of watercourses belonging to different abiotic and biocenotic types could result in higher predictive value of PD indices.…”

Deconstructing richness patterns by commonness and rarity reveals bioclimatic and spatial effects in black fly metacommunities

“…Many studies have addressed why environmental variables not spatially correlated generally have poor predictive power of variation in aquatic communities (Heino et al ., , ; Pyne, Rader & Christensen, ; Roque et al ., ). In our study, the role of many factors acting simultaneously at different scales – for example, a set of environmental variables spatially structured – may partly explain the poor predictive power of the pure environmental component, at least for richness of common species.…”