2017
DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2017.712090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TCO Paradox—A Key Problem in the Diffusion of Energy Efficient Vehicles?

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to explore how mainstream vehicle buyers perceive and apply Total Cost of Ownership in their vehicle choice process. All else equal, rational consumers ought to evaluate Total Cost of Ownership in order to acquire the real cost of owning a particular vehicle under consideration, unless bounded rationality is affecting their behavior. The results reveal that vehicle buyers generally are capable of understanding the relative size of individual costs that make up vehicle Total Cost of Own… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vehicle purchasers do tend to be less focused on a comprehensive TCO calculation considering depreciation. A survey of respondents in Europe estimated that depreciation was the single largest cost of owning and operating a vehicle, yet only half of respondents had an approximate knowledge of depreciation rates, and only 8% planned to use depreciation rates in an ex-ante cost computation before purchase (Hagman et al 2017). However, concern about potential obsolescence of ICEVs may lead consumers to delay purchase of a conventional vehicle or to switch to an electric vehicle (Neil 2018;Huetter 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vehicle purchasers do tend to be less focused on a comprehensive TCO calculation considering depreciation. A survey of respondents in Europe estimated that depreciation was the single largest cost of owning and operating a vehicle, yet only half of respondents had an approximate knowledge of depreciation rates, and only 8% planned to use depreciation rates in an ex-ante cost computation before purchase (Hagman et al 2017). However, concern about potential obsolescence of ICEVs may lead consumers to delay purchase of a conventional vehicle or to switch to an electric vehicle (Neil 2018;Huetter 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many car owners only calculate operational costs, such as fuel, and disregard the car's depreciation in value, which is often the single largest cost of car ownership. A recent study shows that limited understanding of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a barrier to the uptake of electric cars [24]. In this study only 42% of potential car-buyers estimated the cost of ownership, and only 8% included depreciation of value.…”
Section: Summary Of Existing Literature Related To the Aim Of This Armentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Including participants with very new cars could have added other perspectives since they are generally much more expensive to own, when value deprecation is included in the cost of the car. In financial models, the depreciation-rate is commonly approximated as loosing 50% of the car's value in the first three years [26]. Information on the participants' cars can be found in Table 2.…”
Section: Intervention 1: Making the Costs Of Car Ownership Transparentmentioning
confidence: 99%