The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism

Abstract

In the aftermath of a potentially demoralizing 2008 electoral defeat, when the Republican Party seemed widely discredited, the emergence of the Tea Party provided conservative activists with a new identity funded by Republican business elites and reinforced by a network of conservative media sources. Untethered from recent GOP baggage and policy specifics, the Tea Party energized disgruntled white middle-class conservatives and garnered widespread attention, despite stagnant or declining favorability ratings among the general public. As participant observation and interviews with Massachusetts activists reveal, Tea Partiers are not monolithically hostile toward government; they distinguish between programs perceived as going to hard-working contributors to US society like themselves and “handouts” perceived as going to unworthy or freeloading people. During 2010, Tea Party activism reshaped many GOP primaries and enhanced voter turnout, but achieved a mixed record in the November general election. Activism may well continue to influence dynamics in Congress and GOP presidential primaries. Even if the Tea Party eventually subsides, it has undercut Obama's presidency, revitalized conservatism, and pulled the national Republican Party toward the far right.

Populism and the Return of the “Paranoid Style”: Some Evidence and a Simple Model of Demand for Incompetence as Insurance against Elite Betrayal

“…DM's with a competence level k , have a 8 It is hard to quantify these two strands of populism, but Google scholar reports a very similar number of entries for left wing populism and right wing populism. See, for example, Norris (2005) and Williamson, et al, (2011). One extension in Acemoglu, Egorov and Sonin (2013) The competence of DM's is not the only determinant of whether DMs help the people who put them in office.…”

Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media

“…Apart from its sheer novelty, several forces conspired to encourage scholars and political professionals to pursue this problem. The importance of online media grew after 2008: President Barack Obama's digital effort was hailed widely in both 2008 and 2012 (Levenshus, 2010;Scherer, 2012;Smith, 2009;Wallsten, 2010), and the Tea Party insurgency that brought the Republican party back into control of the US House of Representatives relied initially on online social media to circumvent traditional party channels (Williamson, Skocpol, & Coggin, 2011). At the same time, traditional public opinion surveys began to struggle with rising non-response rates and increased cell phone usage, which prompted a search for new means of measuring and forecasting political attitudes and intent (Boyle, Fleeman, Kennedy, Lewis, & Weiss, 2013;Christian, Keeter, Purcell, & Smith, 2010;Keeter, Kennedy, Dimock, Best, & Craighill, 2006;Kohut, Keeter, Doherty, Dimock, & Christian, 2012;Viera, Medway, Turner, & Marsh, 2013).…”

From Folk Devils to Folk Heroes: Rethinking the Theory of Moral Panics

“…As Berlet (2010) has illustrated, "the most militant anti-Obama ideologues construct frames and narratives based on a dualistic worldview in which Obama [is] demonized and scapegoated for existing economic, social, and political problems." The right-wing "Tea Party" movement, which emerged through 2009 as a mainstream political force (Williamson, Skocpol, and Coggin 2011), characterized Obama as a "Nazi, fascist, communist, socialist, monarchist or racist" (Jacobsen 2010:2). Obama's job approval average duly dropped from nearly 70% in January 2009 to just 50% in January 2010, while those actively disapproving rose from just above 10% to over 40% over the same period (Jacobsen 2010).…”