2014
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Teacher Benefits From Giving Autonomy Support During Physical Education Instruction

Abstract: Recognizing that students benefit when they receive autonomy-supportive teaching, the current study tested the parallel hypothesis that teachers themselves would benefit from giving autonomy support. Twenty-seven elementary, middle, and high school physical education teachers (20 males, 7 females) were randomly assigned either to participate in an autonomy-supportive intervention program (experimental group) or to teach their physical education course with their existing style (control group) within a three-wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
0
18

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
103
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…First, teacher-provided autonomy support benefi ts students in very important ways. Students who are randomly assigned to receive autonomy support from their teachers, compared to those who are not (students in a control group), experience higher-quality motivation and display markedly more positive classroom functioning and educational outcomes, including more need satisfaction, greater autonomous motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation, identifi ed regulation), greater classroom engagement, higher-quality learning, a preference for optimal challenge, enhanced psychological and physical well-being, and higher academic achievement (Cheon & Reeve, 2013Cheon, Reeve, & Moon, 2012 ;Cheon, Reeve, Yu, & Jang, 2014 ;Reeve, Jang, Carrell, Jeon, & Barch, 2004 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Sheldon, & Deci, 2004 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Soenens, & Matos, 2005 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Soenens, & Lens, 2004 ). The general conclusion from these experimental studies is that students benefi t from receiving autonomy support, and they benefi t in ways that are widespread and educationally important, even vital.…”
Section: Motivating Style: Why It Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, teacher-provided autonomy support benefi ts students in very important ways. Students who are randomly assigned to receive autonomy support from their teachers, compared to those who are not (students in a control group), experience higher-quality motivation and display markedly more positive classroom functioning and educational outcomes, including more need satisfaction, greater autonomous motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation, identifi ed regulation), greater classroom engagement, higher-quality learning, a preference for optimal challenge, enhanced psychological and physical well-being, and higher academic achievement (Cheon & Reeve, 2013Cheon, Reeve, & Moon, 2012 ;Cheon, Reeve, Yu, & Jang, 2014 ;Reeve, Jang, Carrell, Jeon, & Barch, 2004 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Sheldon, & Deci, 2004 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Soenens, & Matos, 2005 ;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Soenens, & Lens, 2004 ). The general conclusion from these experimental studies is that students benefi t from receiving autonomy support, and they benefi t in ways that are widespread and educationally important, even vital.…”
Section: Motivating Style: Why It Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous research has mostly focused on the process of altering coaches' behaviors to improve athletes' psychosocial outcomes (Langan, Blake, & Lonsdale, 2013), this study, along with recent SDT-based research (Cheon et al, 2014;Solstad et al, 2015), indicate that future CDPs should also emphasize the intrinsic value of giving empowering sports coaching to athletes for coaches themselves. Importantly, considering the hustle and bustle of everyday life and the voluntary nature of youth sports coaching (Baklien, Ytterhus, & Bongaardt, 2015;Langan et al, 2013), it seems safe to argue that many coaches who attend coach education may be doing so because they feel obliged to do so.…”
Section: Practical Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation might be that the giving of empowering sports coaching, such as giving autonomy-support, social-support, and emphasizing criteria for mastery that are personally controllable, are all expressions of helping behaviors (Martela & Ryan, 2015Weinstein & Ryan, 2010) that benefit not only the receiver, but the giver as well (Deci et al, 2006). Indeed, such behaviors, indicative of empathetic, prosocial acts, have been shown to be positively related to basic needs satisfaction (Cheon et al, 2014;Solstad et al, 2015).…”
Section: (Ahead Of Print)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, provision of autonomy support has been found to be positively associated with better relational functioning (Patrick, Knee Canevello, & Lonsbary, 2007), greater job satisfaction (Cheon, Reeve, Yu, & Jang, 2014), and basic psychological need satisfaction . The sport psychology literature is replete with models testing athletes' perceptions of coaches' autonomy-supportive behaviors (e.g., Balaguer et al, 2012;Jõesaar et al, 2012) as well as models testing antecedents of coaches' selfreported use of an ASC style in the sport context (e.g., Stebbings, Taylor, Spray, & Ntoumanis, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%