2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-228x.2009.01080.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Teaching Brain

Abstract: Animals cannot teach as humans do. Therefore, we lack the experimental support of animal studies that are so important to understand the evolution of our basic learning skills but are useless to explore the development of the teaching skills, unique to humans. And most important: children teach! We have at least two new challenges in our Mind, Brain, and Education program regarding the teaching brain. First, to implement new methods to process online the way children teach in the digital environment since the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Battro's review of the teaching brain identifies the use of wearable brain image technologies in classrooms as a major new challenge for the field of Mind, Brain and Education (Battro 2010). Whereas studies discussed above used high-quality multiple electrode EEG apparatus, simple EEG devices now retail from below $100.…”
Section: Neurofeedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, Battro's review of the teaching brain identifies the use of wearable brain image technologies in classrooms as a major new challenge for the field of Mind, Brain and Education (Battro 2010). Whereas studies discussed above used high-quality multiple electrode EEG apparatus, simple EEG devices now retail from below $100.…”
Section: Neurofeedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We suggest that teaching research can benefit from an integrated multidisciplinary effort. Domains that have potential to add to our basic knowledge about teaching include the ontogenetic development of human teaching (Davis‐Unger & Carlson, , ; Strauss et al, ), anthropology (Greenfield, ), cultural evolution (Mesoudi, Whiten, & Laland, ), cognitive evolution (Arbilly, Motro, Feldman, & Lotem, ; Shultz, Nelson, & Dunbar, ), nonhuman animal teaching (comparative psychology) (Thornton & Raihani, , ), brain sciences (Battro, , ), artificial intelligence (Dessus, Mandin, & Zampa, ), cognitive archeology from prehistoric periods (Goren‐Inbar, ), psycholinguistics (Bartsch, Wright, & Estes, ), philosophy (Scheffler, ), intelligent tutoring systems (Kopp, Britt, Millis, & Graesser, ), computer–human interface systems, silicon–biology interfaces, and more.…”
Section: A Panoramic View Of Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental psychologists believe that ToM enables teachers to plan, evaluate, and reorganize their teaching to meet the needs of the learner (Strauss, Ziv, & Stein, ). Biologists agree that animals do not have ToM; animals do not modify their teaching based on the learner's ability and progress (Battro, ; Heyes, ; Penn & Povinelli, ; Premack & Premack, ; Premack, n.d. ; Strauss et al, ; Thornton & Raihani, ).…”
Section: Defining Teaching: It Is Not Just Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that we can observe the brain activity underlying specific teaching interactions with new neuroimaging technology (Battro, ). Prior technology has restricted research from capturing the complexity of the social interaction of teaching.…”
Section: The Teaching Brain: Developing a Comprehensive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%