The technological knowledge used by technology education students in capability tasks

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Since technology education is, compared to subjects such as mathematics and science, still a fairly new subject both nationally and internationally, it does not have an established subject philosophy. In the absence of an established subject philosophy for technology education, one can draw on other disciplines in the field, such as engineering and design practice, for insights into technological knowledge. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of an epistemological conceptual framework chiefly derived from engineering, to be able to describe the nature of technological knowledge, in an attempt to contribute towards the understanding of this relatively new learning area. The conceptual framework was derived mainly from Vincenti's (1990) categories of knowledge based on his research into historical aeronautic engineering cases. Quantitative research was used to provide insight into the categories of knowledge used by students at the University of Pretoria during capability tasks and included an analysis of a questionnaire administered to these students. Findings suggest that the conceptual framework used here is useful in technology education and that the categories of technological knowledge apply to all the content areas, i.e. structures, systems and control, and processing, in technology education. The study recommends that researchers and educators deepen their understanding of the nature of technological knowledge by considering the categories of technological knowledge presented in the conceptual framework.

The importance of supporting technological knowledge in post-primary education: a cohort study

“…Considering these types of knowledge in the context of technology education initially requires a broader examination of what the discipline aims to espouse within students. The overall aim of technology education is regularly acknowledged internationally to mean the development of technological capability (Black and Harrison 1985;Kimbell 1994;Norman 1998;Davies and Rogers 2000;Tairab 2001;Shaw 2002;Gibson 2008;Rauscher 2011;Liou 2015). Due to its subjectivity, traditionally it has been difficult to offer an explicit classical definition for the concept of technological capability (Gagel 2004) which has resulted in many definitions now existing in the pertinent literature.…”

Identifying Grade 8 and 9 Technology Teachers’ Areas of Need for Intervention in Limpopo Province

“…Rauscher (2010) concurs that the advent of technology education, nationally and internationally, has posed challenges different from those experienced in regard to other learning areas. Amongst the multiple challenges that can be mentioned, teacher development and empowerment becomes prominent as it is technology teachers that are placed at the forefront to teach learners this relatively new subject.…”

Framing the constructive alignment of design within technology subjects in general education

“…Learning outcomes in technology education take various forms, however they are most often discussed broadly with respect to technological capability (Buckley et al 2019;Gibson 2008;Rauscher 2011;Shaw 2002) and technological literacy (Dakers 2006;Ingerman and Collier-Reed 2011;Williams 2009). These are not considered internationally to be the aims exclusively, for example the Scottish curriculum has made reference to the aspects of technological perspective, technological confidence, technological sensitivity, and technological creativity (Scottish CCC 1996), but they are the most prominent within the discourse.…”