The Technologisation of Education and the Pathway to Depersonalisation and Dehumanisation

Abstract

Contrary to the conventional wisdom, it is a central contention of this piece that there exists a growing crisis of depersonalisation and dehumanisation which has emerged from the computechnological texturing of contemporary society. We shall endeavour to show that the primary mode of electronic communication is characterised by the covert depersonalisation of human relations. Depersonalisation, as we shall define this computechnological dimension of the problem refers to the condition of human relationships wherein we have come progressively to substitute face-to-face human exchange in preference for technologically mediated forms of electronic communication. One significant paradox to be explored here will reveal that we personalise and anthropomorphise our computechnology, while simultaneously depersonalising ourselves and treating others as if they were machines. The criterion of 'employment-efficiency-expectation', as we call it, is now determined by the work capabilities of computechnology, not the work-potential of humans defined in terms of integrated well-being and mental health. When we increasingly treat each other as machines, and our machines as humans, the time has truly come to reflect not only on how we value our relationships with each other, but on the way in which we have come, somewhat mindlessly, to value the very tools of technology which depersonalise and in turn dehumanise those relationships.

Un-Disciplining Ourselves Through an Academic Professional Learning Curriculum Innovation: Towards Social Activism in Scholarly Writing and Teaching

“…Enabling and ensuring the APL of academics in the context of crisis and change is like painting a bus while it is moving. There was pressure on academics to be innovative and responsive, especially in online teaching, which, if not mediated intentionally, could have a de-humanising effect (Laura & Chapman, 2007;Laura & Hannam, 2017). Holding the pedagogical space with integrity and humanity was critical in our attempts to leave no students behind.…”

Co-producing nurse education with academics, students, service users and carers: lessons from the pandemic

“…The increase in mobile applications at the patient's bedside (Roberts and Williams 2017) and the rise in digital communication platforms for staff to communicate with each other may help to develop a more inclusive and unifying approach to understanding one another and sharing decisions (Jarvis 2019). In contrast, these technologies also risk de-personalising the curriculum and losing the human voice in Higher Education (Laura and Hannam 2017). The need for human agency and authentic connection in digital capability development further aligns the needs of this graduate workforce with the principles of heutagogy in developing the self-determined learner.…”