1938
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330230303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The teeth of the Indians of Pecos Pueblo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the well-known overall morphometric variability that characterizes third molars (Nelson, 1938;Thomsen, 1955;Moorrees, 1957;Jacobson, 1982;Kieser, 1990), they might have been expected to be the most variable in enamel thickness. However, the variation that is manifest in the morphology of the enamel cap does not appear to affect its thickness to the same extent.…”
Section: Relative Size Of the Enamel Capmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of the well-known overall morphometric variability that characterizes third molars (Nelson, 1938;Thomsen, 1955;Moorrees, 1957;Jacobson, 1982;Kieser, 1990), they might have been expected to be the most variable in enamel thickness. However, the variation that is manifest in the morphology of the enamel cap does not appear to affect its thickness to the same extent.…”
Section: Relative Size Of the Enamel Capmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a well-documented tendency for modern humans to exhibit a reduction in M3 crown size, and in most populations, M2 tends to be smaller than M1 (e.g., Nelson, 1938;Seipel, 1946;Thomsen, 1955;Moorrees, 1957;Jacobson, 1982;Kieser, 1990). The reduction in size of the more distal (especially M3) crowns would seem to be attained primarily through a differential loss of their dentine components.…”
Section: Molar Enamel Thickness Crown Size Reduction and Masticatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some notable exceptions (Wissler, 1931;Nelson, 1938;Dahlberg, 1945Dahlberg, , 1950Goldstein, 1948;Pedersen, 19491, few studies were then available which detailed the metric and morphologic variation of American Indian and Eskimo teeth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of geographic regions, a large percentage of dental studies have focused on Arctic Aleut-Eskimos and Indian groups of the American Southwest. Considering just the Southwest, data on dental metrics and morphology have been obtained from samples of both skeletal (Nelson, 1938;Snyder, 1959;Morris, 1965;Turner, 1969;Larson, 1978;Coyne, 1981) and living (Kraus, 1959;Morris, 1965Morris, , 1967Morris, , 1981Morris et al, 1978;Dahlberg, 1963;Snyder et al, 1969;Sofaer et al, 1972;Scott, 1973Scott, , 1977Scott and Dahlberg, 1982) populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show the same percentage observed in this paper. Nelson (1938) observed in Pecos Pueblos a high frecuency too for this trait (97.80 %. ); Goldstein (1948) described 100% of shovel shape for Texas Indians and Sioux.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%