“…Resisting these efforts are “progressives” in a tradition of critical education that emphasizes the perspectives of historically marginalized groups and embracing “social studies for social justice” (Au, 2009) focused on nuanced, complex conceptions of historical difference along lines of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and religion (Levstik & Tyson, 2008). Rather than celebrate (in the case of neoconservatives and authoritarian populists) or center (in the case of neoliberals and the managerial middle class) straight, able-bodied, cisgendered, affluent, Christian, white men holding positions of formal power, this approach to history education explicitly interrogates this canon while simultaneously expanding what counts as valuable historical knowledge to include counter narratives (e.g., Salinas, Rodríguez, & Lewis, 2015). While there are certainly examples of this type of progressive history education, the introductory list of current legislative efforts highlight how it is conservative modernization that has often found powerful allies in legislatures and school boards across the United States.…”