2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2004.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Telecommunications Act of 1996: residential rates and competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This attempt to establish facilitiesbased competition between incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) (for example, Baby Bells') and competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) has not been particularly successful. In part it was believed that deregulation would not only lower the cost of local telephone service, but would also dramatically enhance the quality of service offered by telecommunication providers (Loube, 2004). However, recent research suggests that the residential telephone rates in many markets have actually increased (Loube, 2004;Wimmer and Rosston, 2005) and that measures of service quality remain mixed (Clements, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This attempt to establish facilitiesbased competition between incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) (for example, Baby Bells') and competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) has not been particularly successful. In part it was believed that deregulation would not only lower the cost of local telephone service, but would also dramatically enhance the quality of service offered by telecommunication providers (Loube, 2004). However, recent research suggests that the residential telephone rates in many markets have actually increased (Loube, 2004;Wimmer and Rosston, 2005) and that measures of service quality remain mixed (Clements, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%