2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00326-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temperature dependence of the wear resistance of iron-base NOREM 02 hardfacing alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The galling frequency behaviour of 316L at elevated temperature therefore appears to be controlled almost entirely by changes in characteristic galling load with the Weibull shape factor being relatively insensitive to temperature. Whilst reductions in characteristic galling load were observed, these were all relatively smooth, without the abrupt transition in galling resistance as reported by several investigators [8,11]. 316L is well known for its poor galling resistance at loads between 4 -8 MPa 3 , reducing by several MPa with increasing temperature [13,15,16,18,54,55].…”
Section: Initial Investigations With Low Roughness Surfacessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The galling frequency behaviour of 316L at elevated temperature therefore appears to be controlled almost entirely by changes in characteristic galling load with the Weibull shape factor being relatively insensitive to temperature. Whilst reductions in characteristic galling load were observed, these were all relatively smooth, without the abrupt transition in galling resistance as reported by several investigators [8,11]. 316L is well known for its poor galling resistance at loads between 4 -8 MPa 3 , reducing by several MPa with increasing temperature [13,15,16,18,54,55].…”
Section: Initial Investigations With Low Roughness Surfacessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This suggests that the strength of adhesion is irrelevant after the onset of metal-on-metal contact and that surface geometry controls the deformation. This further suggests that a change in the deformation mechanism of the surfaces controls galling, whether this is phase transformation [8,11,14,19,20,26] or removal of protective surface oxide layers [8,14,19,26,28]. Deformation at this length scale therefore appears to be controlled by the geometry of the surfaces rather than the adhesion between them, in bare-metal single phase austenitic materials.…”
Section: Investigation Of Adhesion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although work has predominantly been focussed upon the mechanism of surface deformation and failure, some work has also been carried out on the subsurface changes observed after adhesive wear and galling. A number of authors have reported the formation of a heavily sheared sub-surface region [8,18] which, for austenitic stainless steels has been found to contain strain-induced α -martensite (SIM) [18,19]. As such, martensite is widely considered to be a source of galling resistance in stainless steels since the reduction in galling resistance correlates with the reduction in SIM formation at elevated temperatures [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have reported the formation of a heavily sheared sub-surface region [8,18] which, for austenitic stainless steels has been found to contain strain-induced α -martensite (SIM) [18,19]. As such, martensite is widely considered to be a source of galling resistance in stainless steels since the reduction in galling resistance correlates with the reduction in SIM formation at elevated temperatures [19]. This heavily sheared region is similar in appearance to the sub-surface microstructural changes observed after fretting, termed the white layer [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%