2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temperature effect and correction models for using electrical resistivity to estimate wood moisture variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant increase in ER values was observed between November and March, a period during which average temperatures remained below 5°C for the 3 study sites. Effects of the winter season and lower temperatures on the overall increase in ER values have already been highlighted in previous studies (Ganthaler et al 2019;Larsson et al 2004;Luo et al 2019). Using the temperature correction model of Luo et al (2019), we observed that the ER of the trunks remained very stable whatever the season (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A significant increase in ER values was observed between November and March, a period during which average temperatures remained below 5°C for the 3 study sites. Effects of the winter season and lower temperatures on the overall increase in ER values have already been highlighted in previous studies (Ganthaler et al 2019;Larsson et al 2004;Luo et al 2019). Using the temperature correction model of Luo et al (2019), we observed that the ER of the trunks remained very stable whatever the season (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The present study demonstrates that ER tomography is a useful tool for analyzing structural and functional traits of tree trunks, but temperature effects may substantially limit this method. Unless relevant temperature variations can be excluded, measurements of xylem temperatures and corrections of ER calculations are thus strongly recommended (Ganthaler et al 2019 ; Luo et al 2019 ). To account for complex temperature patterns, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganthaler et al ( 2019 ) showed that average ER values of conifer trunks are correlated with shoot water potential and trunk temperature. While ER distribution patterns do not change above the freezing point, average ER values decrease exponentially from 0 to 30 °C (Ganthaler et al 2019 ; see also Luo et al 2019 ). Thus, temperature effects should be negligible as long as small changes in temperature occur (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the inversion is stopped when the rrms value reaches 2% or χ 2 is around 5 to 8 (Günther and Rücker 2006). Optimized resistivity fields were then temperature-corrected at 25°C (Luo et al 2019) based on field thermometers (see next section) assuming homogeneous lateral temperature distribution and linear depth interpolation. Besides ERT, we installed nine TDR probes along with the ryegrass plant plot at different depths (i.e., soil horizons) for monitoring on an hourly basis soil water content (θ TDR ) and electrical resistivity (ρ TDR ) from 29/ 05/2018 to 26/10/2018.…”
Section: Ert Inversion Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature sensors were installed at the same depths as the TDR for electrical resistivity temperature correction. We followed a 2% decrease in electrical resistivity per degree centigrade (Beff et al 2013;Whalley et al 2017;Luo et al 2019).…”
Section: Ert Inversion Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%