2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temperatures of red supergiants in low-metallicity environments

Abstract: The temperatures of red supergiants (RSGs) are expected to depend on metallicity (Z) in such a way that lower-Z RSGs are warmer. In this work, we investigate the Z-dependence of the Hayashi limit by analysing RSGs in the low-Z galaxy Wolf-Lundmark-Mellote (WLM), and compare with the RSGs in the higher-Z environments of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). We determine the effective temperature (Teff) of each star by fitting their spectral energy distributions, as observed by VLT+S… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is expanded upon by González-Torà et al ( 2021) who re-determined the effective temperatures for the sample of (Davies et al 2013(Davies et al , 2015, and found excellent agreement with the results of Davies et al (2013) and Davies et al (2015). González-Torà et al (2021) found a systematic offset of ∼ 150 K between their results and those of TDN18, with the TDN18 temperatures being the cooler. González-Torà et al ( 2021) explain these differences as the result of a combination of not accounting for non-LTE effects (see Bergemann et al 2013) and continuum placement issues in the wavelength range studied by TDN18.…”
Section: Data Availabilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is expanded upon by González-Torà et al ( 2021) who re-determined the effective temperatures for the sample of (Davies et al 2013(Davies et al , 2015, and found excellent agreement with the results of Davies et al (2013) and Davies et al (2015). González-Torà et al (2021) found a systematic offset of ∼ 150 K between their results and those of TDN18, with the TDN18 temperatures being the cooler. González-Torà et al ( 2021) explain these differences as the result of a combination of not accounting for non-LTE effects (see Bergemann et al 2013) and continuum placement issues in the wavelength range studied by TDN18.…”
Section: Data Availabilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Spectroscopic 𝐴 V determination is likely the most robust method to determine the extinction values of RSGs, as such estimates take into account circumstellar extinction around RSGs. That being said, spectroscopically determined 𝐴 V values have large uncertainties and the agreement between the 𝐴 V measurements between the stars in common between the spectroscopic studies of Levesque et al (2006) and Davies et al (2013), is poor, and has not been resolved with the updated calculations of González-Torà et al (2021). In particular, the stars with 𝐴 V > 0.5 mag in Levesque et al (2006), all have 𝐴 V lower values in González-Torà et al ( 2021) and those with 𝐴 V < 0.5 mag all have larger values in González-Torà et al (2021).…”
Section: Extinction and Reddeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some studies provide evidence that a fixed mixing length is not suitable for all types of stars (e.g., Guenther & Demarque 2000;Bonaca et al 2012;Tayar et al 2017) and that the mixing length depends on metallicity for both low-and high-mass stars (Joyce & Chaboyer 2018;Chun et al 2018). More recently, González-Torà et al (2021) also found that the standard solar mixing length is not applicable to RSGs in their comparison of effective temperature of the Wolf-Lundmark-Mellote (WLM) galaxy with the Geneva evolutionary models. Chun et al (2018) calibrated the mixing length values in RSGs for various metallicities by comparing a grid of massive star evolutionary models with RSGs observed in the nearby universe, and found that the mixing length decreases for decreasing metallicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%