2016
DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-04/afox-mlincoln
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temporal Dimensions of the London Art Auction, 1780–1835

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To take an example from issue 4 of British Art Studies: in their article, "The Temporal Dimensions of the London Art Auction, 1780-1835," Matthew Lincoln and Abram Fox used the Getty Provenance Index Sales Catalog Database, a database of painting auction records that date between 1780 and 1835, in order to tease out the temporal structures in the early flourishing of art auctions in London, and test their relationship to the schedule of the Royal Academy's exhibitions and the larger "Season" of London society. 6 At the forefront of their article is a section on "Data and Methodology" that clearly lays out the gaps in their data and the attendant issues of historical interpretation. "Like any archive," Fox and Lincoln write, "this database is not a perfect representation of all historical auctions as they actually occurred; we face that intractable historiographic problem in tandem with all historians."…”
Section: British Art Studies and "Digital Art History"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take an example from issue 4 of British Art Studies: in their article, "The Temporal Dimensions of the London Art Auction, 1780-1835," Matthew Lincoln and Abram Fox used the Getty Provenance Index Sales Catalog Database, a database of painting auction records that date between 1780 and 1835, in order to tease out the temporal structures in the early flourishing of art auctions in London, and test their relationship to the schedule of the Royal Academy's exhibitions and the larger "Season" of London society. 6 At the forefront of their article is a section on "Data and Methodology" that clearly lays out the gaps in their data and the attendant issues of historical interpretation. "Like any archive," Fox and Lincoln write, "this database is not a perfect representation of all historical auctions as they actually occurred; we face that intractable historiographic problem in tandem with all historians."…”
Section: British Art Studies and "Digital Art History"mentioning
confidence: 99%