1946
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1946.0176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Temporomandibular Joint: Theory of Reflex Controlled Nonlever Action of the Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigators nevertheless have argued that the condyle and articular fossa are simply not designed by nature to withstand the large resultant forces required by the model . The class III lever model has also been criticized, as it does not take into consideration the center of mandibular rotation …”
Section: Biomechanics Of the Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other investigators nevertheless have argued that the condyle and articular fossa are simply not designed by nature to withstand the large resultant forces required by the model . The class III lever model has also been criticized, as it does not take into consideration the center of mandibular rotation …”
Section: Biomechanics Of the Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson was another worker expressing disagreement with the lever action of the mandible concept . This was based on the information that the resultant adductor muscle force passes through the first molar tooth.…”
Section: Biomechanics Of the Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomeckanical considerations have focused extensive1 on the relationship between the mandi 8 le and temporal bone durin mastication, and have led to considerable as a lever (Hylander, 1975;Picq et al, 19871, joint. A rapid rise in these disor rt ers among tematic methodology for the de B inition, diagde % ate as to whether the mandible functions a link (Robinson, 1946;Taylor, 19861, or both (Gingerich, 1979). Hylander (1975) provided a detailed description of this debate and argued strongly in favor of the lever hypothesis.…”
Section: Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid rise in these disor rt ers among tematic methodology for the de B inition, diagde % ate as to whether the mandible functions a link (Robinson, 1946; Taylor, 19861, or both (Gingerich, 1979). Hylander (1975) provided a detailed description of this debate and argued strongly in favor of the lever hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, it has been assumed that the bone is a rigid structure, and as such behaves according to static equilibrium theory. 10,11 Mathematical models necessarily assume structural rigidity and concentricity in the sagittal view, factors that complicate the analysis and limit their usefulness. Such restrictions encourage the development of models, which are more representative of nonrigid, inhomogeneous structures, and which allow the simulation of wide areas of muscle attachment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%