2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tensor rank of tensor product of two three-qubit W states is eight

Abstract: We show that the tensor rank of tensor product of two three-qubit W states is not less than eight. Combining this result with the recent result of M. Christandl, A. K. Jensen, and J. Zuiddam that the tensor rank of tensor product of two three-qubit W states is at most eight, we deduce that the tensor rank of tensor product of two three-qubit W states is eight. We also construct the upper bound of the tensor rank of tensor product of many three-qubit W states.MSC: 15A69; 15A72; 46A32; 46B28; 46M05; 47A80; 53A45

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that these bounds hold for tensor rank as well. In particular, the following result generalizes the expressions for W ⊗2 3 given in [CJZ18] and for W ⊗3 3 given in [CF18] and answers Question 5 in Open Problems 16 of [CF18] in the setting of partially symmetric tensors.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We point out that these bounds hold for tensor rank as well. In particular, the following result generalizes the expressions for W ⊗2 3 given in [CJZ18] and for W ⊗3 3 given in [CF18] and answers Question 5 in Open Problems 16 of [CF18] in the setting of partially symmetric tensors.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The following result is a weaker version of Theorem 10 in [CF18]: it gives the same lower bound as [CF18] for the tensor product W 3 ⊗ W 3 , but only restricting to the partially symmetric case. Our proof uses completely different techniques: we essentially perform a case by case analysis on the different possible bi-degrees of a divisor on P 1 × P 1 ; some of the arguments that we use are completely general and may be found useful to address other problems in the partially symmetric setting.…”
Section: Lower Bounds On the Partially Symmetric Rankmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…providing R(W ⊗ W ) ≤ 2 · 2 + 2 · 1 + 1 · 2 = 8 < 9 = 3 · 3, which gives an example of strict submultiplicativity of tensor rank. Following this proof, [CF18] proved that R(W ⊗ W ) ≥ 8, and thus R(W ⊗ W ) = 8.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We obtained numerical evidence pointing to 8. After the first version of our manuscript appeared on the arXiv, Chen and Friedland delivered a proof that R(W 3 ⊗ W 3 ) ≥ 8 [22]. For the third power, it is known that R(W 3 W 3 W 3 ) = 16 [23].…”
Section: Tensor Rank Is Not Multiplicative Under the Tensor Productmentioning
confidence: 99%