2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Terminologia Histologica after 10 years: Inconsistencies, mistakes, and new proposals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His remarkable answer revealed a deep passion of the scientist for culture: 'The idea to call the newly discovered cells telocytes came to me during a break at the Vienna State Opera' (Manole and Creţoiu 2015). Oddly, the revolutionary discovery of 2005 and the intense research of the following years were not enough for telocytes to be included in the official, widely accepted histological nomenclature Terminologia Histologica (FIPAT 2008), despite the fact that it contains all terms associated with cells, tissues and organs at the microscopic level (Varga et al 2018). The logical question, and one of the most common, is how is it possible that telocytes were not discovered earlier?…”
Section: Interstitial Cajal-like Cells and Telocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His remarkable answer revealed a deep passion of the scientist for culture: 'The idea to call the newly discovered cells telocytes came to me during a break at the Vienna State Opera' (Manole and Creţoiu 2015). Oddly, the revolutionary discovery of 2005 and the intense research of the following years were not enough for telocytes to be included in the official, widely accepted histological nomenclature Terminologia Histologica (FIPAT 2008), despite the fact that it contains all terms associated with cells, tissues and organs at the microscopic level (Varga et al 2018). The logical question, and one of the most common, is how is it possible that telocytes were not discovered earlier?…”
Section: Interstitial Cajal-like Cells and Telocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly proposed terms, either by the Consensus documents or by other authors during research in last 10 years (if found relevant), are written in bold italics. [8][9][10][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like earlier versions of Nomina (1955,1961,1966,1977) and Terminologia Anatomica (1998Anatomica ( , 2011, the modern version is not perfect and it can be criticised in the future by astute authors, which is a good practice in anatomy [7,11,13,[16][17][18][19][20]26]. We are surprised that FIPAT describes [see endnote 66] the sigmoid sinus (sinus sigmoideus) as the terminal portion of the transverse sinus (sinus transversus) as such a definition is archaic.…”
Section: New Terminologia Anatomica Warrants Further Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be always simple, clear, precise, logical and coherent. Like other sets of scientific terms, the anatomical language is alive and changing, and consecutive versions of Terminologia Anatomica might reflect these changes, thereby providing a useful source of information over decades [9,11,13,23,26]. Although these recent changes [5] seem to be inspired by a long tradition and do not come as a surprise to anyone in the field, other modifications are characterised by innovativeness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%