1953
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5010030305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The test for the apparent specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate

Abstract: The British Standard test for the apparent specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate (B.S. 812: 1951) has been found to give variable results. The present paper describes an investigation made to devise a test that would not suffer from this variability.The factors thought to affect the results of the test were studied, and it has been found that the following modifications to the standard procedure are desirable:I . The size of aggregate tested should preferably be $-k in.The rate of corrosion of ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, it was observed during tests dry RCA containing the highest fraction of fine material showed the biggest reduction of 8.9% between SC dry and SC moist , a value similar to the 9.4% difference found by Jorge et al [21] on C&D aggregates. However, the level of storage capacities found in this study are in the lower range of what could be expected according to Shergold [15] and Ferguson [16]. This probably reflects the greater C u of the real-life materials (Figure 3) than normally accounted for in open-graded sub-base aggregates, where C u is often below 2 [16].…”
Section: Surface Permeabilitycontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…In line with this, it was observed during tests dry RCA containing the highest fraction of fine material showed the biggest reduction of 8.9% between SC dry and SC moist , a value similar to the 9.4% difference found by Jorge et al [21] on C&D aggregates. However, the level of storage capacities found in this study are in the lower range of what could be expected according to Shergold [15] and Ferguson [16]. This probably reflects the greater C u of the real-life materials (Figure 3) than normally accounted for in open-graded sub-base aggregates, where C u is often below 2 [16].…”
Section: Surface Permeabilitycontrasting
confidence: 74%