2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-009-0474-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The testable implications of competitive equilibrium in economies with externalities

Abstract: Nash–Walras equilibrium, Externalities, Public goods, Testable restrictions, Empirical implications, Revealed preferences, D12, D50, D62,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the more general speci…cation could, in principle, be the starting point for our analysis, it is known that such general preferences impose only trivial restrictions for revealed-preference tests in models with externalities (Carvajal 2010;Deb 2009). Intuitively, this occurs because changes in the level of externalities create a large degree of ‡exibility in utility functions to rationalize revealed preferences.…”
Section: The Utility Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the more general speci…cation could, in principle, be the starting point for our analysis, it is known that such general preferences impose only trivial restrictions for revealed-preference tests in models with externalities (Carvajal 2010;Deb 2009). Intuitively, this occurs because changes in the level of externalities create a large degree of ‡exibility in utility functions to rationalize revealed preferences.…”
Section: The Utility Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these challenges, the …rst contribution of this paper is a general, revealedpreference methodology for testing a variety of preference structures that may underlie charitable giving. The approach builds on recent innovations in revealed-preference theory that allow for the incorporation of externalities (Carvajal 2010;Deb 2009) and characteristics (Blow, Browning, and Crawford 2008) into a standard model of consumption. Empirically, the tests are simple linear programs that are transparent, computationally e¢ cient, and straightforward to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown and Matzkin (1996) study testable restrictions in an exchange economy. This analysis is extended in Brown and Shannon (2000) who study the testable restriction of competitive equilibria, and Carvajal (2010) who extends the analysis to competitive economies with externalities. Cherchye, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2007) and Cherchye, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2010) characterize the behavioral consequences of the collective household model presented in Browning and Chiappori (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RP analysis can also be performed on equilibrium models where there are multiple agents interacting in an economy or game. Brown and Matzkin (1996) Carvajal 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%