The tethered humanity hypothesis among victims of interpersonal harm: The role of apologies, forgiveness, and the relation between self-, other-, and meta-perceptions of humanity

Abstract

When interpersonal harm is inflicted, victims stop seeing themselves as fully human. The tethered humanity hypothesis proposes that victims restore a full human status when perpetrators undertake attempts at reconciliation and victims manage to reestablish the humanness of their perpetrators. In two studies, we tested this hypothesis and manipulated the perpetrators attempts at apologizing for their misconduct. Participants were either included or socially excluded and received a full or self-exonerating apology or a hostile message when they were excluded. Results indicated that victims dehumanized themselves and their ostracizers when they were socially excluded and managed to regain a full human status and rehumanized their perpetrators when a full apology was uttered. Moreover, regression analyses indicated that different humanness judgments (self, other, and meta-humanness) become tethered only when perpetrators apologized, while forgiving the perpetrator always correlated with the rehumanization of the self regardless of the perpetrator’s apology.

Nonhuman treatment reduces helping others: self-dehumanization as a mechanism

“…Further, Vaes and Bastian (2021) revealed that the above effect also occurred among self-dehumanized victims. Additionally, self-dehumanized individuals could still increase their humanness through the above approach even without perpetrators’ apology ( Vaes et al, 2022 ). Therefore, the prosociality of self-dehumanized objectification-victims may not decrease if they are offered a chance to forgive their perpetrators who objectified them.…”