1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(75)85131-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theoretical conformational analysis of some bridged aromatic compounds: diphenyl ether, diphenylmethane, benzophenone and diphenyl sulphide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1976
1976
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the u angle determines the conformation of that bond. [17,18] that the conformation of such bonds is mostly trans, i.e., the u angle equals 0°. For the CO O bond, the conformational energy minimum corresponds to trans-conformation ±6°, and transition into cis-conformation requires energy of 5-10 kcal/mol [19,20].…”
Section: Polyheteroarylenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the u angle determines the conformation of that bond. [17,18] that the conformation of such bonds is mostly trans, i.e., the u angle equals 0°. For the CO O bond, the conformational energy minimum corresponds to trans-conformation ±6°, and transition into cis-conformation requires energy of 5-10 kcal/mol [19,20].…”
Section: Polyheteroarylenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable controversy in the literature concerning the favored geometry for diphenyl ether, with different scientific evidence supporting the Morino and skewed forms. Theoretical conformational studies on this molecule have been attempted by Zubkov, Birshtein, and Milevskaya [16], by Galasso, De Alti, and Bigotto [7], and by Smeyers and Hernandez-Laguna [ 171 in order to identify the favored conformation and determine the energy barrier for phenyl group rotation. Zubkov et al [16] performed classic and semiempirical calculations of the various conformations; their results were quite indecisive.…”
Section: Diphenyl Ethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical conformational studies on this molecule have been attempted by Zubkov, Birshtein, and Milevskaya [16], by Galasso, De Alti, and Bigotto [7], and by Smeyers and Hernandez-Laguna [ 171 in order to identify the favored conformation and determine the energy barrier for phenyl group rotation. Zubkov et al [16] performed classic and semiempirical calculations of the various conformations; their results were quite indecisive. EHT and CND0/2 calculations favor the Morino structure, MrND0/2 favored structure A, and the classic calculations using Lennard-Jones (12,6) potentials plus the torsional term KO,, = V2(1 -cos 241) + V*(1 -cos 242) predicted the skewed form (X) to be lowest in energy.…”
Section: Diphenyl Ethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calculée en fonction de l'angle de torsion a est représentée sur la figure 1 relativement peu traitée (tableau VI); des deux conforma tions compatibles avec l'a.o.m. expérimentale la prem ière recoupe le résultat fourni par la diffraction des rayons-X (47), la seconde rejoint la conclusion d'une étude théorique récente (48).…”
Section: -A Nisotropies Optiques Moléculaires Calculéesunclassified