2022
DOI: 10.3390/nano12060903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Theoretical Study of Kink Deformation in Graphite Based on Differential Geometric Method

Abstract: Kink deformation is often observed in materials with laminated layers. Graphite composed of stacked graphene layers has the unique laminated structure of carbon nanomaterials. In this study, we performed the interlayer deformation of graphite under compression using a simulation of molecular dynamics and proposed a differential geometrical method to evaluate the kink deformation. We employed “mean curvature” for the representativeness of the geometrical properties to explore the mechanism of kink deformation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kink bands are highly localized deformation regions in highly anisotropic layered systems, which can accommodate the strain energy by redistributing it from energetically expensive in-plane bonds to cheaper out-of-plane bonds [41]. Recent studies show the increasing appearance of kink bands [2,24,25,37,42] in layered solids, which may accommodate unprecedented amounts of plastic deformation in graphite beyond what is possible with conventional point defect models [18,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kink bands are highly localized deformation regions in highly anisotropic layered systems, which can accommodate the strain energy by redistributing it from energetically expensive in-plane bonds to cheaper out-of-plane bonds [41]. Recent studies show the increasing appearance of kink bands [2,24,25,37,42] in layered solids, which may accommodate unprecedented amounts of plastic deformation in graphite beyond what is possible with conventional point defect models [18,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%