2015
DOI: 10.1057/bp.2015.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theory and practice of party modernisation: The conservative party under David Cameron, 2005–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To get the electorate to listen to the arguments required a major change in terms of their presentation -i.e. Cameron as the new face (one uncontaminated with the past); their rhetoric and tone (using inclusive language) and their focus (emphasising non-Conservative issues) (Quinn, 2008; see also Kerr andHayton, 2015 andDommett, 2015).…”
Section: For Cameron International Aid Prioritisation Was a Means To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get the electorate to listen to the arguments required a major change in terms of their presentation -i.e. Cameron as the new face (one uncontaminated with the past); their rhetoric and tone (using inclusive language) and their focus (emphasising non-Conservative issues) (Quinn, 2008; see also Kerr andHayton, 2015 andDommett, 2015).…”
Section: For Cameron International Aid Prioritisation Was a Means To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of commentators have suggested that the approach of the Conservatives, and indeed the Coalition government as a whole, was not particularly 'compassionate' (for example, Griffiths, 2012;Wright, 2012;Eaton, 2014;Patrick, 2015;Bochel and Powell, 2016), and that, similarly, the wider 'modernisation' project can be seen as a failure (Dommett, 2015;Kerr and Hayton, 2015). The remainder of this article explores what happened to compassionate Conservatism during that period.…”
Section: Whatever Happened To Compassionate Conservatism?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Firstly, as noted above, a variety of different terms were used to describe perceived changes of emphasis in the Conservative Party, and the broad and interchangeable use of these, by both politicians and commentators (see also Dommett, 2015;Kerr and Hayton, 2015), was likely to lead to the conflation of different ideas and perspectives. Secondly, there may have been very real differences between the proponents of these approaches, even if they were frequently using the same words and even focusing on the same social problems and Griffiths (2014) differentiates Cameron's progressive conservatism from One Nation conservatism and Red Toryism, arguing that from Disraeli to the 1980s, One Nation conservatism involved progressivism as social justice, and used the state to achieve its ends, rather than cutting back the state.…”
Section: The Ideas That Came Under the Broad Banner Of Compassionate mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sinn Fein participation in the powersharing institutions created under the GFA birthed a discourse of equality based reform from within that was undermining the traditional Unionist grip on political power (Bean 2007 How extensive or meaningful this consultation process was has since been questioned, exposing internal tension over party modernisation -a process where older, problematic ideological strands are refined to reflect contemporary societal reality through policy change that will appeal to more voters (Dommett 2015). Given the natural unease involved in departing from previous positions, the process is most successful where there is strong internal discipline (Ozbudun 1970).…”
Section: 'Critical Engagement'mentioning
confidence: 99%