2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theory of pattern formation on directed networks

Abstract: Dynamical processes on networks have generated widespread interest in recent years. The theory of pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems defined on symmetric networks has often been investigated, due to its applications in a wide range of disciplines. Here we extend the theory to the case of directed networks, which are found in a number of different fields, such as neuroscience, computer networks and traffic systems. Owing to the structure of the network Laplacian, the dispersion relation has both re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
179
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
179
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] Similarly, recent advances in microfabrication allow the generation of engineered networks of reaction units, e.g., with labon-chip microdroplets, [3] electrode arrays, [4,5] BZ beads, [6] or microelectrofusion. [7] The interplays between local reaction kinetics (nodes), the physical processes that create coupling (link), and the architecture of the network in such systems can lead to a wealth of self-organized phenomena, including synchronization, [4,6,8] stationary Turing and oscillatory patterns, [9,10,11,12,13] or excitation waves. [14,15,16] Stationary patterns generated via the Turing [17] mechanism have been observed in experiments for both continuous [18] and networked [19] systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Similarly, recent advances in microfabrication allow the generation of engineered networks of reaction units, e.g., with labon-chip microdroplets, [3] electrode arrays, [4,5] BZ beads, [6] or microelectrofusion. [7] The interplays between local reaction kinetics (nodes), the physical processes that create coupling (link), and the architecture of the network in such systems can lead to a wealth of self-organized phenomena, including synchronization, [4,6,8] stationary Turing and oscillatory patterns, [9,10,11,12,13] or excitation waves. [14,15,16] Stationary patterns generated via the Turing [17] mechanism have been observed in experiments for both continuous [18] and networked [19] systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D x and D y are the diffusion coefficients. To make contact with the analysis carried out in [14], we shall deal with perfectly balanced networks, namely, graphs characterized by an identical number of ingoing and outgoing links. We will then assume that Eqs.…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the above linear system, one needs to introduce the eigenvalues (α) and eigenvectors φ (α) of the Laplacian operator [7,14]. These are solutions of the eigenvalue problem…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent efforts focusing on pattern formation over directed graphs [27], [28] and multigraphs [28], [29], [30], [31] share a common characteristic: the matrices describing coupling among nodes are the Laplacian operators associated with the network structures, yielding P ( k ) with zero row-sum. While this assumption is appropriate in the context of diffusion-driven instabilities, it does not permit the study of pattern formation propelled by mechanisms without diffusible molecules, e.g., in the case of lateral inhibition P ( k ) is row-stochastic (studied in [25], [26] when P ( k ) are identical and symmetric).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%