2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00590.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The therapeutic dilemma: How to use tadalafil

Abstract: Tadalafil, a type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor, is a new and effective therapy for erectile dysfunction. It has unique pharmacokinetic properties in its drug class, which also includes sildenafil and vardenafil. It is also well tolerated with few side-effects, and can be used in difficult patients such as neuropaths or diabetics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested, although not demonstrated, that there might be a tendency for younger men to choose tadalafil because it gives them a broader window of opportunity, while older men tend to prefer vardenafil or sildenafil [30]. To solve the dilemma of therapeutic choice, it has been proposed to give each patient a short‐ [31] and long‐acting agent [32], and for individuals to decide on their preference [33]. In any case, most patient‐preference studies of these drugs conducted to date have serious design flaws that hinder interpretation of the data, and thus limit the utility of the results [34–36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested, although not demonstrated, that there might be a tendency for younger men to choose tadalafil because it gives them a broader window of opportunity, while older men tend to prefer vardenafil or sildenafil [30]. To solve the dilemma of therapeutic choice, it has been proposed to give each patient a short‐ [31] and long‐acting agent [32], and for individuals to decide on their preference [33]. In any case, most patient‐preference studies of these drugs conducted to date have serious design flaws that hinder interpretation of the data, and thus limit the utility of the results [34–36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, all three PDE5Is currently available are excellent, effective, and very well‐tolerated drugs, with a safety profile better than that of aspirin [47]. The few, existing differences are consequence of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the three molecules: tadalafil seems superior in number of full sexual intercourse per pill (due to the longer half life) [13,48], preference [49–51], and switching [49,52]; vardenafil have been particularly studied in the parameter of the duration of erection [53] and discreet use [10,54], and sildenafil seems the best in vascular efficacy when penile hardness is examined, particularly with the dose of 100 mg [44]. Only clinical experience, careful evaluation of the couple setting, and evidence‐based data will permit to individuate the subset of patients in which one drug, or one dose, or dose regimen, is to be considered of first choice.…”
Section: Couple's Taxonomy Of Treatments For Erectile Dysfunction [Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited data suggest that the combination of tadalafil daily dosing with a short-acting PDE5i can improve outcomes, without a significant increase in side effects [259,260]. Table 5 may help in the choice of PDE5i [156,[261][262][263][264][265][266][267][268][269][270]. Interestingly, a recent perspective open-label study evaluated the efficacy and the safety of combination the co-administration of a PDE5i and topical alprostadil (300 μg/100 mg) in patients with ED non-responders to oral therapy alone (avanafil, sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil used at the maximal available doses, 200, 100, 20 and 20 mg, respectively) [271].…”
Section: Pde5i Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%