Thermal Conductivity 14 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3751-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated conductivities at temperatures of 50 K, 100 K, and 300 K are 1.90 × 10 9 S/m, 2.41 × 10 8 S/m, 4.14 × 10 7 S/m, respectively. These results are in good agreement with the experimental data (being 2.12 × 10 9 S/m, 2.27 × 10 8 S/m, and 3.66 × 10 7 S/m [26]).…”
Section: A the Convergence And Precision Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The calculated conductivities at temperatures of 50 K, 100 K, and 300 K are 1.90 × 10 9 S/m, 2.41 × 10 8 S/m, 4.14 × 10 7 S/m, respectively. These results are in good agreement with the experimental data (being 2.12 × 10 9 S/m, 2.27 × 10 8 S/m, and 3.66 × 10 7 S/m [26]).…”
Section: A the Convergence And Precision Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As the thermal conductivity of the metal baffles (aluminum alloy, 301 W m −1 K −1 (ref. 50)) is over an order of magnitude higher than that of the catalyst (CuO/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 , 20 W m −1 K −1 (ref. 51)), the temperature distribution of the 6 mm channel reactor is much more uniform and the average reaction temperature is higher than the others, which is favorable for the MSR reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…51)) is much lower than that of the metal baffle (301 W m −1 K −1 (ref. 50)) in the reactor, an increase in the flow channel equivalent diameter means that the distance between the catalyst core and the reactor flow channel edge is enlarged, so that the temperature difference between the core and surface of the catalyst bed is higher (not shown in Fig. 7), and the average catalyst temperature is lower.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific capacity at different C-rates was determined by chronoamperometry. 44 The cells were first charged (0.1C at 25 °C) to 4.2 V. Afterwards, a voltage step to 3.0 V was applied and the current transient was recorded at a sampling rate of 1 Hz. The current transient was then converted into the common capacity vs C-rate representation by the mathematical procedure described in Ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%