1966
DOI: 10.1021/je60030a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Thermal Conductivity of Solid and Liquid Parahydrogen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, only the transient hot-wire measurements of Roder 15 and the steady-state hot-wire measurements of Roder and Diller 13 can be considered as primary data. In addition, the data of Powers et al, 46 in this case, deviated very much from the above two sets making them unusable, while the uncertainty of the data of Dwyer et al 78 makes that set unsuitable for this work. Figure 10 shows the temperature and pressure range of the primary measurements outlined in Table 4.…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, only the transient hot-wire measurements of Roder 15 and the steady-state hot-wire measurements of Roder and Diller 13 can be considered as primary data. In addition, the data of Powers et al, 46 in this case, deviated very much from the above two sets making them unusable, while the uncertainty of the data of Dwyer et al 78 makes that set unsuitable for this work. Figure 10 shows the temperature and pressure range of the primary measurements outlined in Table 4.…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Other data not shown inFig. 10include "zero" J = 1 H-at 15.1 to 17.1 K under pressures of 8.9 to 20.4 MPa (88 to 201 atm) 68. The values of 0.8 to 1.0 W/m-K fit right onto the 1 W/m-K line that the hightemperature data ofFig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…9Comparisons of viscosity calculated by use of REFPROP[6] with experimental normal hydrogen data (% X versus Temperature)Dwyer et al (1966) [109] Powers et al(1954) [36]Roder and Diller (1970) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dwyer et al (1966) [109] Powers et al(1954) [36]Roder and Diller (1970) [37] Roder (1984)[15] Fig 11. Comparisons of thermal conductivity calculated by use of REFPROP[6] with experimental parahydrogen data (% X versus Temperature)Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%