2008
DOI: 10.4324/9780203932827.pt2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The third sector and civil society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In corporatist countries like Germany, The Netherlands or Belgium, many parts of public service delivery have traditionally been entrusted to civil society (Dekker, 2004; Zimmer, 1999). In other countries, for example, in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia, governmental bureaucracies traditionally deliver these services, and only a ‘small’ civil society in domains like education and welfare is observed (Jenei and Kuti, 2007; Wijkström and Zimmer, 2011). This implies that the path-dependent nature of government–civil society relationships in public service delivery and the underlying paradigm of public administration should be taken into account.…”
Section: Developments That Condition the Nature Of Contemporary Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In corporatist countries like Germany, The Netherlands or Belgium, many parts of public service delivery have traditionally been entrusted to civil society (Dekker, 2004; Zimmer, 1999). In other countries, for example, in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia, governmental bureaucracies traditionally deliver these services, and only a ‘small’ civil society in domains like education and welfare is observed (Jenei and Kuti, 2007; Wijkström and Zimmer, 2011). This implies that the path-dependent nature of government–civil society relationships in public service delivery and the underlying paradigm of public administration should be taken into account.…”
Section: Developments That Condition the Nature Of Contemporary Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Central and Eastern European countries have introduced schemes where citizens can designate a small portion of their income tax payments for third‐sector organizations. In Hungary, a ‘1 per cent system’ was introduced in 1997 (Jenei and Kuti 2008). On the other hand, many countries have had explicit policy approaches prioritizing public provision of care over private‐sector care, either in the context of accreditation or by discriminating against private providers in access to public funding (e.g.…”
Section: The Emerging Welfare MIX In Long‐term Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative weakness of third sector developments has been characterized by various factors, including the level of civic engagement, a lack of trust in organizations, the difficult search for new relationships with the state, and, not least, the lack of income from the state (e.g. Toepler and Salamon 2003;Mansfeldová et al 2004;Frič 2008;Jenei and Kuti 2008;Nemec 2008).…”
Section: The Emerging Welfare MIX In Long-term Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of countries is based on the availability of data, referring to their inclusion into the John Hopkins study. 21 Indeed,Jenei and Kuti (2008) argue that third sector organisations are quite vulnerable in postsocialist countries, as they do not have large independent foundations yet. They argue that third sector in those countries is often seen as the extension of government, as it is very important in the…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%