1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(88)90343-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Thomas-Ehrman shift across the proton dripline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic increase in the value of TES was demonstrated in [6] for systems beyond the proton dripline with increasing of proton (or two-proton) Q-values.…”
Section: This Paper Probes If the Thomas-ehrman Shift (Tes)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic increase in the value of TES was demonstrated in [6] for systems beyond the proton dripline with increasing of proton (or two-proton) Q-values.…”
Section: This Paper Probes If the Thomas-ehrman Shift (Tes)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[6]. This work compared experimental masses M exp with masses M cg provided by chargesymmetric mass relationship…”
Section: This Paper Probes If the Thomas-ehrman Shift (Tes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 of Ref. [9]). Based on shell model calculations predicting this 0 1 2 state at 2.6 MeV Gilman et al [10] calculate for this transition a cross section 6 times smaller than for the GST at pion energies in the D-resonance region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Adding the energy displacement of the 16 Ne ground state as given in Ref. [9] results in a total displacement of 21.5͑2͒ MeV for the 0 1 2 state. This value, though very large, fits very well into the phenomenological systematics of Thomas-Ehrman shifts across the proton dripline (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the TES were recently extended to nuclei with an even number of "valence" nucleons, which allowed for estimates of nuclear configuration mixing [26]. The TES effect is responsible for energy anomalies in the nuclei near and especially beyond the proton drip line [27]. In our case, the 1=2 þ g.s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%