2004
DOI: 10.1261/rna.5177504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The three-dimensional architecture of the class I ligase ribozyme

Abstract: The class I ligase ribozyme catalyzes a Mg ++ -dependent RNA-ligation reaction that is chemically analogous to a single step of RNA polymerization. Indeed, this ribozyme constitutes the catalytic domain of an accurate and general RNA polymerase ribozyme. The ligation reaction is also very rapid in both single-and multiple-turnover contexts and thus is informative for the study of RNA catalysis as well as RNA self-replication. Here we report the initial characterization of the three-dimensional architecture of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for this is that the starting B16-19 ligase was highly adapted and is likely in a strong local fitness optimum (Lehman 2004). In fact, if the secondary structure in Figure 2 is correct, then less than half of the ligase's nucleotides are not base paired (62 of 135), and some of these are involved in tertiary contacts (Bergman et al 2004). Thus relatively little of the molecule is actually free to tolerate mildly deleterious mutations; all of the ones that we did see lay in non-basepaired regions ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for this is that the starting B16-19 ligase was highly adapted and is likely in a strong local fitness optimum (Lehman 2004). In fact, if the secondary structure in Figure 2 is correct, then less than half of the ligase's nucleotides are not base paired (62 of 135), and some of these are involved in tertiary contacts (Bergman et al 2004). Thus relatively little of the molecule is actually free to tolerate mildly deleterious mutations; all of the ones that we did see lay in non-basepaired regions ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, classic work with sources tethered to single residues of transfer RNA, ribosomes, and other non-coding RNAs calibrated the relationship of RNA backbone cleavage with distance and established the utility of these data for nucleotide-resolution RNA and RNA-protein modeling (see, e.g. Bergman et al 2004;Culver & Noller, 2000;Han & Dervan, 1994;Lancaster et al 2002). The reliability of pairwise constraints from tethered radical source experiments has been further supported by comparison of these and other types of biochemical data on the ribosome with subsequently solved crystal structures (Sergiev et al 2001;Whirl-Carrillo et al 2002).…”
Section: Precedents For Pairwise Data From Tethered Radical Cleavagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, solution HRP, which reports the approximate backbone solvent accessibility for most nucleotides in an RNA molecule (Cate et al, 1996;Tullius and Greenbaum, 2005), is straightforward to implement. HRP measurements have been used to evaluate or filter RNA structural ensembles (Bergman et al, 2004;Jonikas et al, 2009;Rangan et al, 2003;Tullius and Greenbaum, 2005) but have not been used to drive RNA 3D structure determination in a quantitative and systematic way. We developed an approach that incorporates solvent accessibility information derived from HRP measurements to bias DMD (Dokholyan et al, 1998;Zhou and Karplus, 1997) simulations in order to generate structural ensembles consistent with experimental measurements.…”
Section: Solvent Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%