2011
DOI: 10.1177/0734282911423356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Three Dimensions of the Student–Teacher Relationship Scale

Abstract: The validity of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS) was examined in a preschool community sample (N = 925) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Factorial invariance across genders was also investigated as was concurrent and discriminant validity. Indicators of validity were teacher-rated social competence, problem behavior, and mental health, as well as the children's score on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Results showed that the original three-dimensional model of the STRS was not satisf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(56 reference statements)
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly modified 10‐item version of the Conflict subscale from the Student–Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS; Pianta, ) was used to assess conflict in the caregiver–child relationship (α = .76; Solheim, Berg‐Nielsen, & Wichstrøm, ).…”
Section: Teacher‐rated Child Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly modified 10‐item version of the Conflict subscale from the Student–Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS; Pianta, ) was used to assess conflict in the caregiver–child relationship (α = .76; Solheim, Berg‐Nielsen, & Wichstrøm, ).…”
Section: Teacher‐rated Child Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results did not support the original item structure and their modified model included a 26-item solution. Similarly, Solheim et al ( 2012 ) did not find an adequate model fit, when testing the original three dimensional STRS model using CFA. Instead, they proposed a modified 25-item 3-factor version that displayed an acceptable fit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, a negative teacher-child relationship can affect children's behaviors as well as their academic trajectories (Solheim et al, 2012 ). Children with less positive interactions with their teacher, often become disengaged or distant from classroom activities and may develop negative attitudes toward school (O'Connor, 2010 ; Cadima et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although teacher-child conflict and closeness have been inversely related to each other (Griggs, Gagnon, Huelsman, Kidder-Ashley, & Ballard, 2009; Henricsson & Rydell, 2004), there are mixed findings on the relations of teacher-child dependence and closeness (Birch et al, 1998; Cornellissen & Verschueren, 2002; Gregoriadis & Tsigilis, 2008; Griggs et al, 2009; Pianta, 2001). Thus, dependence may or may not be viewed as a negative aspect of the teacher-child relationship, and the meaning of such relationships may differ by culture (Gregoriadis et al, 2008; Solheim, Berg-Nielsen, & Wichstrom, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%