2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-018-9371-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Throwaway Society: a Look in the Back Mirror

Abstract: Whilst public criticisms of an increasingly wasteful consumer society emerged already in late 19 th Century, the specific concept of a "Throwaway Society" was first used in the early 1960s. This note on a passionate debate around planned obsolescence and oversaturated consumers offers a short historical glimpse at a persistent, existential problem that still awaits effective solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related area of research has found that providing product updates causes consumers to devalue their existing versions of the product and encourages unnecessary new purchases ( Bellezza et al, 2017 ). Raising consumer awareness of the concept of planned obsolescence in industrial production (i.e., where companies intend for the product to become obsolete, in terms of functionality, design or desirability; Hellmann & Luedicke, 2018 ) may promote consumer demand for higher quality, longer lasting products that are more likely to be retained or recirculated. However, as noted by William Morris as far back as the 1800s, there remains a tension between promoting the uptake of well-crafted, durable goods, and ensuring that products are affordable for all ( Van Helvert, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A related area of research has found that providing product updates causes consumers to devalue their existing versions of the product and encourages unnecessary new purchases ( Bellezza et al, 2017 ). Raising consumer awareness of the concept of planned obsolescence in industrial production (i.e., where companies intend for the product to become obsolete, in terms of functionality, design or desirability; Hellmann & Luedicke, 2018 ) may promote consumer demand for higher quality, longer lasting products that are more likely to be retained or recirculated. However, as noted by William Morris as far back as the 1800s, there remains a tension between promoting the uptake of well-crafted, durable goods, and ensuring that products are affordable for all ( Van Helvert, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linear economy, the primary aim is to generate high volume outputs—what Stahel (2016) has described as “‘bigger-better-faster-safer’ syndrome” (p. 436). This approach has been criticized as contributing to the overconsumption of resources and environmental degradation, by encouraging planned obsolescence and a “throw-away” culture ( Andrews, 2015 ; Hellmann & Luedicke, 2018 ). Faced by a need to develop production and consumption systems that are both environmentally sustainable and socially just (i.e., providing enough to support everyone’s material needs, but avoiding exceeding planetary boundaries; Raworth, 2017 ), alternative economic models have been advocated, including a circular economy or “closed loop” approach, in which material resources are conserved as much as possible and waste is minimized ( House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, 2014 ; Stahel, 2016 ).…”
Section: Societal Significance Of the Human–artifact Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing countries are plagued with weak regulations and irresponsible norms (Hellman et al, 2000;Kaufmann, 2004) to the extent that they are even rationalized (Anand et al, 2004). In such situations, irresponsibility permeates into formal and informal institutions, refers to as institutionalized irresponsibility (Hellmann and Luedicke, 2018).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, throwaway consumption is a macrosocial phenomenon as denoted by terms such as “throwaway culture” and “throwaway society” that are considered as apt terms for describing the contemporary consumer culture (Hellmann & Luedicke, , p. 83). Consumer culture does not refer simply to a high incidence of consumption but to a “culture of consumption” where “core social practices and cultural values … are defined and oriented in relation to consumption” (Slater, , p. 24, emphasis in original).…”
Section: Environmental Sustainability Consumer Culture and Throwawamentioning
confidence: 99%