2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
333
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(70 reference statements)
7
333
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, studies have explored how aspects such as network centrality, perceptions of power, demographics, and personality traits are associated with observer accuracy of the social network structure in workplaces or network experiments (e.g., Bondonio, 1998; Casciaro, 1998; Casciaro, Carley, & Krackhardt, 1999; Simpson, Markovsky, & Steketee, 2011). Moreover, consistent with the idea that accurate perception may yield more effective outcomes, additional studies of adults have demonstrated that observer accuracy of social relationships are linked to benefits such as leadership, power, and positive work outcomes (e.g., Balkundi & Kilduff, 2006; Krackhardt, 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For example, studies have explored how aspects such as network centrality, perceptions of power, demographics, and personality traits are associated with observer accuracy of the social network structure in workplaces or network experiments (e.g., Bondonio, 1998; Casciaro, 1998; Casciaro, Carley, & Krackhardt, 1999; Simpson, Markovsky, & Steketee, 2011). Moreover, consistent with the idea that accurate perception may yield more effective outcomes, additional studies of adults have demonstrated that observer accuracy of social relationships are linked to benefits such as leadership, power, and positive work outcomes (e.g., Balkundi & Kilduff, 2006; Krackhardt, 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although leaders may perceive they have a good understanding of the social network of interactions around them based on their perceptions of relationships, research suggests that their perceptions are not very accurate and in fact the accuracy of their perceptions for some networks decline as one ascends the hierarchy (Casciaro 1998;Cross and Parker 2004;Kilduff and Krackhardt 1994). Scholarship on leadership and the use of social networks suggest that leaders need to attend to both their own cognitive views of the relationships, as well as carefully examine the existing patterns to best maximize organizational outcomes (Balkundi and Kilduff 2005). Social network theory and analysis may enable central office and site leaders to build and sustain bridges of communication, support, and knowledge between their worlds as they enact system-wide change.…”
Section: A Bridge Between Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Linton Freeman (2004) and Prasad Balkundi and Martin Kilduff (2005) a key point of emphasis of the social networks literature is the essential difference between individuals’ attributes and their structural positions in social networks. While studies such as Lubbers et al (2007) provide important insights about the composition of migrants’ networks, egocentric network data ultimately cannot map out the larger transnational networks that connect individuals together, and, as a result, cannot locate the position of respondents within those networks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%