2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tilt illusion: Phenomenology and functional implications

Abstract: The perceived orientation of a line or grating is affected by the orientation structure of the surrounding image: the tilt illusion. Here, I offer a selective review of the literature on the tilt illusion, focusing on functional aspects. The review explores the merits of mechanistic accounts of the tilt illusion based upon sensory gain control in which neuronal responses are normalized by the pooled activity of other units. The role of inhibition between orientation-selective neurons is discussed, and it is ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
126
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
10
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did find a genuine perceptual bias for stimuli oriented further away from the discrimination boundary, this effect had a very different tuning profile than the reference repulsion bias in reproduction responses, and did not necessitate an explicit discrimination judgment of the biased stimulus against the boundary (Experiment 3). In terms of orientation tuning, the perceptual bias rather resembled a tilt illusion (Clifford, 2014;Gibson, 1937;Schwartz, Hsu & Dayan, 2007;Wenderoth & Johnstone, 1987) or tilt-aftereffect (Gibson & Radner, 1937;Webster, 2015). Consequently, our experiments provide evidence against the perceptual nature of reference repulsion, indicating that making fine discrimination judgments does not alter the appearance of visual stimuli, but instead leads to a post-perceptual working memory or decision bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did find a genuine perceptual bias for stimuli oriented further away from the discrimination boundary, this effect had a very different tuning profile than the reference repulsion bias in reproduction responses, and did not necessitate an explicit discrimination judgment of the biased stimulus against the boundary (Experiment 3). In terms of orientation tuning, the perceptual bias rather resembled a tilt illusion (Clifford, 2014;Gibson, 1937;Schwartz, Hsu & Dayan, 2007;Wenderoth & Johnstone, 1987) or tilt-aftereffect (Gibson & Radner, 1937;Webster, 2015). Consequently, our experiments provide evidence against the perceptual nature of reference repulsion, indicating that making fine discrimination judgments does not alter the appearance of visual stimuli, but instead leads to a post-perceptual working memory or decision bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, to address the possibility that the effect is mediated by an interaction between near and far surrounds (e.g., lateral inhibition, Clifford, 2014;O'Toole & Wenderoth, 1977), we used a near 525 surround tilted at ±45°, with the far surround oriented horizontally or vertically as before. In this experiment, the orientation difference between the near and the far surround is always the same (45° for both vertical and horizontal far surrounds), equating the interaction between the near and the far surrounds.…”
Section: Non-linear Competition Between Adjacent Dissimilar Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(We quantitatively verified this claim by finding the orientations with the most Fourier energy in the "contrast" of the stimuli, where "contrast" was calculated as the squared difference between the stimuli image and the background value.) Importantly, the sign of TI depends on the orientation difference between the surround and the target: at ~5 to ~65° 585 orientation differences, the shift in the perceived orientation is in the opposite direction relative to the surround orientation ("repulsive effect"), whereas orientation differences of ~80° lead to a shift of the perceived orientation in the direction of the surround ("attractive effect", also known as the indirect tilt illusion) (Clifford, 2014). Therefore, under the "A+V" condition, the first-order orientation content (e.g., repulsive from -45°) leads to the same sign of TI as the second-order orientation (repulsive from -22.5°, 590 or attractive toward +67.5°).…”
Section: Non-linear Competition Between Overlapping Dissimilar Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the context surrounds a target, this phenomenon is referred to as the tilt illusion (TI, Fig. 1A, Clifford, 2014;Gibson, 1937), and when the context precedes a target in time, it is referred to as the tilt aftereffect 35 (TAE, Fig. 1B, Gibson & Radner, 1937;Webster, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%