2011
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v16-945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Time at which a Lévy Process Creeps

Abstract: We show that if a Lévy process creeps then, as a function of u, the renewal function V (t, u) of the bivariate ascending ladder process (L −1 , H) is absolutely continuous on [0, ∞) and left differentiable on (0, ∞), and the left derivative at u is proportional to the (improper) distribution function of the time at which the process creeps over level u, where the constant of proportionality is d −1 H , the reciprocal of the (positive) drift of H. This yields the (missing) term due to creeping in the recent qui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the asymptotic behaviour of P(Tx ∈ (t, t + ∆]) is given by the RHS of (2) evaluated with x replaced by x − bt. As we will see, (8) and (9) hold in the general case, as does (7). We also have analogous results for the regime where ρ is bounded away from zero and infinity and t → ∞, where we make no assumptions about X other than (H) and that it is a strongly non-lattice subordinator.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…where the asymptotic behaviour of P(Tx ∈ (t, t + ∆]) is given by the RHS of (2) evaluated with x replaced by x − bt. As we will see, (8) and (9) hold in the general case, as does (7). We also have analogous results for the regime where ρ is bounded away from zero and infinity and t → ∞, where we make no assumptions about X other than (H) and that it is a strongly non-lattice subordinator.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Now P z (w ′ τ (0) = 0) = 0 if z > 0 so we only need to consider z ≤ 0. If z < 0, then by Lemma 5.1 of [14],…”
Section: General Marginal Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proof. By [15], Corollary 3.1, for z > 0 and γ, r ≥ 0, Thus substituting (7.5), (7.6) and (7.7) into (7.1) gives…”
Section: Finiteness Of ηmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…e αy Π L −1 ,H (dr − s, y + dγ) dy,where the I(γ > 0) term may be omitted in the final expression since the measure there assigns no mass to the set {γ = 0}. On the other hand, if X creeps, that is d H > 0, then from[15], Theorem 3.1(ii),…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%