1951
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.81.717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Time Average Magnetic Field at the Nucleus in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
4

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
92
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(However, it was often possible to check this calibration over various points in the time course and it was very stable over time, typically within +0.05 ppm.) It was necessary to determine the chemical shift of the reference in each experiment because of the geometry-dependent susceptibility shift of the paramagnetic external reference solution (24) and the inability to position it with extreme reproducibility from mouse to mouse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(However, it was often possible to check this calibration over various points in the time course and it was very stable over time, typically within +0.05 ppm.) It was necessary to determine the chemical shift of the reference in each experiment because of the geometry-dependent susceptibility shift of the paramagnetic external reference solution (24) and the inability to position it with extreme reproducibility from mouse to mouse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic requirement for a valid measurement is that the resonance frequencies for sample and reference be obtained under precisely the same value of the magnetic induction, B 0 . In some experimental measurements, as described below, B 0 (sample) ≠ B 0 (reference) as a result of bulk (isotropic) magnetic susceptibility (BMS) effects, which give rise to demagnetizing fields [5]. In these circumstances, it is essential to apply a suitable correction, as described in Section 5, and it is appropriate to designate a "corrected" or "true" chemical shift to distinguish it from the "apparent" or observed value obtained by rote application of eq.…”
Section: General Aspects Of Chemical Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was introduced in electrostatics by Lorentz (10) but applies equally well to magnetostatic situations (e.g., 11). It was first used in the context of NMR by Dickinson (12). The sphere of Lorentz is a notional sphere drawn around a nucleus; it is large enough for all the molecules external to it to be treated as a macroscopic continuum that is locally uniform.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%