The time of dialogic sociology

García, José Ramón Flecha; Saso, Carmen Elboj; Torras-Gómez, Elisabeth; Joanpere, Mar

doi:10.1177/02685809221111890

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Until 2007, the professors who dominated each area of knowledge arbitrarily decided who was hired and who was not, who was promoted and who was not (Flecha, 2022). There were very significant sayings at the time: "if I want, I'll make a lamppost a professor" or "the smart one must be removed".…”

Section: Sexual Harassmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feudalism, meritocracy and sexual harassment

Gallego

Serradell

Morlà-Folch

et al. 2023

HSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific literature has clarified that the contexts of more intense power relations favor sexual harassment and impunity. This article presents the results of a research that has analyzed a legislation aimed at combating sexual harassment that preceded six months earlier the selection and evaluation of faculty. The communicative research methodology followed the criteria of social impact and creation, which are currently required by the European Union research program. In addition to a documentary review, sixteen interviews were conducted, twelve with teachers who led the research that gave rise to these reforms and three with victims who managed to become survivors. The result shows an affirmation shared by all interviewees: the passing of legislation against sexual harassment weakened feudal relationships within universities and made members of the Spanish parliament aware of the need to overcome these relationships through meritocratic evaluation. This result can contribute to a twofold process: that feminisms support democratic and social reforms in universities and that those who elaborate scientific policies know that guaranteeing gender equality and overcoming sexual harassment is the way to promote scientific productivity.

show abstract

Section: Sexual Harassmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feudalism, meritocracy and sexual harassment

Gallego

Serradell

Morlà-Folch

et al. 2023

HSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When writing about and demonstrating researchers' social impact in research proposals and CVs, it is also important to distinguish between improvements generated by their scientific knowledge or by other factors (Flecha et al, 2022). Researchers developing vaccines need to find evidence of individuals or groups who have used their vaccine and whose health has improved after using it.…”

Section: ) To Avoid Confusing the Social Impact Of The Specific Scien...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal Methodology for Addressing the Social Impact Component within Project Proposals and Curriculum Vitae

Gutiérrez-Fernández,

Zubiri-Esnaola,

López de Aguileta

et al. 2023

RIMCIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scientific and grey literature have highlighted the increasing relevance of the social impact of research. More and more, funding and evaluation agencies are using social impact as a required criterion when assessing the excellence of research proposals and researchers’ CV. However, research has identified elemental confusions about what social impact is in most research proposals, CVs and consulting companies. Based on the communicative methodology which co-led the creation and elaboration of the priorities of social impact and co-creation, the study presented in this paper includes the knowledge co-created along years of dialogues with scientists and citizens and a documentary analysis of four official documents on social impact and researcher evaluation. Results identify the first scientific six guidelines to date on how to include researchers’ actual or potential social impact in the research proposals and CVs1) To avoid confusing social impact with dissemination or transference; 2) To identify the concrete social impact of the specific scientific knowledge created by the authors; 3) To precise the concrete indicators of each social impact; 4) To specify the concrete sources; 5) To identify the interactive social impact; 6) To include the potential social impact.

show abstract

“…This paper is based on the theoretical framework of the dialogic society [15,16]. It builds on the increasing dialogic turn [17] of all the sectors of our society and on how to improve it by overcoming inequalities and power relations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It builds on the increasing dialogic turn [17] of all the sectors of our society and on how to improve it by overcoming inequalities and power relations. To exemplify this dialogic turn, it can be seen in a concrete change in many households worldwide: the previously named man or head of a family no longer decides all the rules of a house without dialogue; his wife, daughters, and sons question and demand their voices to be heard in decision-making [15]. Likewise, this also happens in social work (as in all other fields of knowledge), where professionals and researchers can no longer impose their views and steps on the service users and participants of a study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contributions from Research with (and Not without) Roma Women to Social Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic

López de Aguileta

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific literature has evidenced that some social work practices and research tend to foster assimilation and silence ethnic minorities. In the case of Roma, previous research has shown that many social welfare practices do not consider their voices and end up in actions for surveillance and control over social transformation. However, the successful practices in social work with the Roma population that overcome these limitations remain underexplored. This work contributes to this gap in the scientific literature by uncovering one key criterion of some successful actions in this regard. Through the communicative methodology, six women’s focus groups and 30 life stories were conducted. In total, this included 47 Roma women and 33 Roma men from three different Spanish regions, as well as interviews with 30 professionals from education, social services, and civic organizations. The results from the studied context present evidence of a main successful criterion in some social work practices: the inclusion of scientific evidence in the intervention with co-creation with the end-users through egalitarian dialogue. That is, in this context, through the use of scientific evidence together with the co-creation process, the results were very positive.

show abstract

The time of dialogic sociology

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Feudalism, meritocracy and sexual harassment

Feudalism, meritocracy and sexual harassment

Optimal Methodology for Addressing the Social Impact Component within Project Proposals and Curriculum Vitae

Contributions from Research with (and Not without) Roma Women to Social Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About