The time required for high speed airstreams to atomise water drops

Jenkins, D. C.

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-29364-5_145

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Later, Ritz and Mongia [6] developed a fuel injection model which included the fuel injection and breakup. Their model was based on sinuous wave motion [7] and the boundary layer stripping(BLS) [8] with the higher relative speed of surrounding gas. The sinuous wave model of fuel film is not enough to describe the physical motion of fuel film in 3-D.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a Stochastic Fuel Injection Model for Gas Turbine Combustors

Micklow

Cho

1995

Volume 3: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In gas turbine combustors, enhanced atomization through the whole combustor region is essential for satisfactory performance since droplet size and distribution can have direct impact on almost all key aspects of combustion. To predict these flows, KIVA-II, a three-dimensional full Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver with the capability to handle finite rate chemistry and liquid spray injection is utilized. The Monte-Carlo based spray model in KIVA-II was developed to predict the flows in internal combustion engines and includes submodels for drop injection, breakup, coalescence, and evaporation. To assess the validity of the spray model for gas turbine combustors, numerical flow field predictions have been compared with experimental data provided by University of California, Irvine (UCI) Combustion Laboratory. The predicted spray behavior is in satisfactory agreement between the numerical prediction and the experiment downstream near the fuel injector. However, far downstream of the nozzle exit the deviation between the numerical results and the experimental data increases.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a Stochastic Fuel Injection Model for Gas Turbine Combustors

Micklow

Cho

1995

Volume 3: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The deformation of the droplets leads to a change in their drag coefficient (Jenkins and Booker 1965, Crowe et al 1963, Ortiz et al 2004, Simpkins and Bales 1972, Luxford et al 2005, which in turn modifies its resistance and therefore the final trajectory of the drop. There are several expressions of the drag coefficient for droplets deformed by airflows in the literature.…”

Section: Trajectory Models Drag Coefficientmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are several expressions of the drag coefficient for droplets deformed by airflows in the literature. Jenkins and Booker (1965) consider that a droplet of initial radius that is accelerated and disintegrated by an air stream U has the same acceleration as a drop of constant radius subjected to a constant relative velocity U with an equivalent constant drag coefficient of 2.26. Ortiz et al (2004) provide a correlation for droplets subjected to a high velocity stream between the value of the drag coefficient and the values of Ohnesorge number ℎ and the Weber number ,…”

Section: Trajectory Models Drag Coefficientmentioning

confidence: 99%