2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The timing and tempo of the Neolithic expansion across the Central Balkans in the light of the new radiocarbon evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5A). This indicates mobility from there to Central Europe in accordance with archaeological models [Por+20]. The lowest genetic distances can be observed to Southern Europe, where the Neolithic expansion followed another route [Boc+09; Boc+12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5A). This indicates mobility from there to Central Europe in accordance with archaeological models [Por+20]. The lowest genetic distances can be observed to Southern Europe, where the Neolithic expansion followed another route [Boc+09; Boc+12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…They therefore may not be representative for the entire region and their long mobility vectors pointing to the Northwest are probably an artefact of the also low data density in Central Europe and Britain, where our ancestry field misrepresents a most likely more Western Hunter-Gatherer-related (WHG) profile. During the 6th millennium BC, correlating well with the beginning of the Neolithisation in the region [Por+20], we observe more plausible non-locality signals: The ancestry profile of Early Neolithic individuals like e.g. I3948 [Mat+18] from the Adriatic coast, points, to Western Anatolia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The eastern region of present-day Croatia demarcates the southern edge of the Pannonian Plain (broadly synonymous with the Carpathian Basin), and is intersected by the Danube river, Sava, Drava and other large tributaries that are the site of many prehistoric settlements and formed an important part of communication and exchange networks in this area 11 , 12 . The emergence of the Neolithic here can be traced to the arrival of the Starčevo culture, which spread from present-day Serbia west and northwards into the Carpathian Basin 13 , while at coastal sites the Early Neolithic was marked by the presence of the Impressed Ware culture from about 6000 BCE 14 , 15 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches and the contributions they can make to the understanding of long-term history and to justifying the validity of the methods themselves are strongly represented in this issue (e.g. [30][31][32][33]). For example, as Arroyo-Kalin & Riris [30] put it in their study of regional population patterns in Amazonia, 'simply put, the size of human populations bears on how novel human niches are formed, how traditions of material culture evolve, why people intensify food production, and how new languages diversify within a language family'.…”
Section: Archaeological Demography Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of the conclusion of Tallavaara & Jørgensen [33] that archaeological temporal resolution is not generally good enough to tell us about instantaneous growth and decline rates, it is interesting that Porcǐćet al's [32] calculation of a growth rate for incoming farming populations in the Central Balkans over approximately 200 years produces estimates of well over 1%, entirely compatible with ethnographic rates and resulting from the much higher carrying capacity made possible by farming. It was immediately followed by a rapid drop, down to half the peak level within 200 years, before rising equally rapidly to another peak.…”
Section: Populations In Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%