2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01051.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Timing of Middle‐Childhood Peer Rejection and Friendship: Linking Early Behavior to Early‐Adolescent Adjustment

Abstract: This study used a sample of 551 children surveyed yearly from ages 6 to 13 to examine the longitudinal associations among early behavior, middle-childhood peer rejection and friendedness, and early-adolescent depressive symptoms, loneliness, and delinquency. The study tested a sequential mediation hypothesis in which (a) behavior problems in the early school years are associated with middle-childhood peer rejection and (b) rejection, in turn, leads to lower friendedness and subsequently higher adolescent inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
199
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
11
199
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an alternative interpretation implies that loneliness and depression are independent but sequential manifestations of an unmeasured maladaptive process [54]. Another possible model is that internalizing problems in young children cause peer rejection and loneliness in later childhood, which then leads to depression in adolescence [51]. Given the lack of any associations between peer rejection and loneliness (T1 and T2) or depression (T3) in the current study, such an explanation does not fit the current data.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For example, an alternative interpretation implies that loneliness and depression are independent but sequential manifestations of an unmeasured maladaptive process [54]. Another possible model is that internalizing problems in young children cause peer rejection and loneliness in later childhood, which then leads to depression in adolescence [51]. Given the lack of any associations between peer rejection and loneliness (T1 and T2) or depression (T3) in the current study, such an explanation does not fit the current data.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Further research is needed, particularly since social competence has been highlighted as a significant predictor for optimal developmental outcomes in both the short term and the long term (Alonso Bde et al, 2014). For example, childhood peer rejection has been shown to be one of the strongest predictors of current and future adjustment problems (Bagwell, Newcomb, & Bukowski, 1998 (Pedersen, Vitaro, Barker, & Borge, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the WSPT program changed the depressed students' estimations or if it worked in a way to encourage CoM students to choose friends who do not smoke is left to be determined by future studies. Given the support in the literature, which suggests that depressed adolescents have a difficult time making friends and are often at the periphery of the social group, we are confident that the WSPT program changed cognitions rather than being able to affect change in friendships within a year (Aseltine, Gore, & Colten, 1994;Bosacki, Dane, & Marini, 2007;Henrich, Blatt, Kuperminc, Zohar, & Leadbeater, 2001;Oldehinkel, Rosmalen, Veenstra, Dijkstra, & Ormel, 2007;Pedersen, Vitaro, Barker, & Borge, 2007). Furthermore, both interpersonal and cognitive theories of depression suggest that difficulty with peer interactions, whether they are accurate with their perceptions or if they are biased in their perceptions, would agree that changing friendship groups would be unlikely (Joiner & Coyne, 1999;Lakdawalla et al, 2007;Marcus & Nardone, 1992).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 83%