2004
DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.41.1.101.25090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Timing of Repeat Purchases of Consumer Durable Goods: The Role of Functional Bases of Consumer Attitudes

Abstract: In an attempt to bring consumer psychology theories into research on the timing of repurchase of consumer durables, the authors suggest that attitude functions (knowledge, value expressive, social adjustive, and utilitarian) can help explain and predict interpurchase intervals. Adopting an interactionist perspective, the authors propose that the effect of the attitude functions is contingent on contextual factors, which they theorize as the nature of the product (along public-private and luxury-necessity dimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
205
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
205
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, this empirical investigtion uses the 'pace of technological innovativeness' (Greenhow & Robelia, 2009;Grewal, Mehta &Kardes, 2004;Garcia & Calantone, 2002), 'the technological acceptance model' (Rauniar, Rawski, Yang & Johnson, 2014;Davis, 1989;Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989), and 'technological anxiety' (Garcia & Calantone, 2002) measures to explore the hoteliers' attitudes toward web technologies. In addition, it also uses the CSR measures that relate to the hospitality businesses' commercial, ethical and social responsibility (Frey & George, 2010;Singh & Del Bosque, 2008;Holcomb et al, 2007;Carroll, 1999).…”
Section: The Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, this empirical investigtion uses the 'pace of technological innovativeness' (Greenhow & Robelia, 2009;Grewal, Mehta &Kardes, 2004;Garcia & Calantone, 2002), 'the technological acceptance model' (Rauniar, Rawski, Yang & Johnson, 2014;Davis, 1989;Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989), and 'technological anxiety' (Garcia & Calantone, 2002) measures to explore the hoteliers' attitudes toward web technologies. In addition, it also uses the CSR measures that relate to the hospitality businesses' commercial, ethical and social responsibility (Frey & George, 2010;Singh & Del Bosque, 2008;Holcomb et al, 2007;Carroll, 1999).…”
Section: The Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent communication research has developed indicators to measure the dialogic level of online stakeholder engagement (Moreno & Capriotti, 2009), little research has attempted to identify the legitimacy constraints on managing the communications of sustainable and responsible behaviours through digital media (Sparks, Perkins & Buckley, 2013). Therefore, this study investigates the owner-managers' stance on "technology acceptance" for marketing communications (Greenhow & Robelia, 2009;Grewal et al, 2004;Garcia & Calantone, 2002;Davis, 1989).…”
Section: The Formulation Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated two models using the sample A data: one with only project feature variables and another that includes both the social capital variables and the interplay of the developer user and end user communities. We account for censoring by following Grewal et al (2004) and removing censored observations from the holdout sample before calculating the predictive validity scores. With the sample B data, we compared the two models in terms of their root mean square errors (RMSE), mean absolute errors (MAE), and Thiel's U statistic (TUS) (Greene 2003).…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose a parametric Weibull hazard model formulation to account for the baseline trend of the upselling likelihood during the customer lifetime and to allow for a time-varying formulation of our focal variables, pre-and post-purchase interactions, service requests, and service complaints (Grewal et al 2004;Kamakura et al 2004). The model defines the hazard rate h(t|k i ) for customer i as:…”
Section: Sample and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%