1972
DOI: 10.1121/1.1913062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the effect of morphological and syntactic boundaries on the temporal structure of spoken utterances. Two speakers produced 20 tokens each of four sets of words consisting of a mono-syllabic base form, disyllabic and trisyllabic words derived from the base by the addition of suffixes, and three short sentences in which the base form was followed by a syntactic boundary; this in turn was followed by a stressed syllable, one unstressed syllable, and two unstressed syllables. The sente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
228
3
11

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
228
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical cues to word boundaries in continuous speech do exist; they include lengthening of onset syllables and segments (Gow and Gordon, 1995;Lehiste, 1972), lengthening of final syllables (Beckman & Edwards, 1990), and aspiration of word-initial stops (in English, Lehiste, 1960;Trager & Bloch, 1941). Phonotactic cues also exist; some sequences of segments (such as [mr] in many languages) cannot co-occur within a syllable, and therefore signal likely word-boundary locations.…”
Section: Segmentation Cues In the Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Physical cues to word boundaries in continuous speech do exist; they include lengthening of onset syllables and segments (Gow and Gordon, 1995;Lehiste, 1972), lengthening of final syllables (Beckman & Edwards, 1990), and aspiration of word-initial stops (in English, Lehiste, 1960;Trager & Bloch, 1941). Phonotactic cues also exist; some sequences of segments (such as [mr] in many languages) cannot co-occur within a syllable, and therefore signal likely word-boundary locations.…”
Section: Segmentation Cues In the Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we cannot currently answer this question. Acousticphonetic studies (Lehiste, 1972;Nakatani & Dukes, 1977) suggest simply that some but not all onsets are marked. We have argued that silence and phonotac tics may provide unambiguous sources of information about word boundary locations.…”
Section: Norris Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The duration differences they reported (and, to some extent, the F0 differences), however, lead us to believe that a prosodic boundary was present, even though its acoustic realization did not involve a silent pause. Segments, especially vowels, tend to be longer in preboundary positions (Klatt, 1976;Lehiste, 1972;Martin, 1970;Oller, 1973, for English;Cambier-Langeveld, 2000;Nooteboom & Doodeman, 1980, for Dutch). Segmental lengthening is strong before an utterance boundary (as in words in isolation), but can also be found at more minor phrase boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the continuous nature of fluent speech poses potentially serious problems for identifying words in the acoustic signal. Fluent speech contains no analogue of the little white spaces between written words in text (Cole & Jakimik, 1980;Lehiste, 1972). Instead, the production of each spoken word blends into the next, obscuring the boundary where one word ends and another begins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%