The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes

Abstract

Toothbrushes play a central role in oral hygiene and must be considered one of the most common articles of daily use. We analysed the bacterial colonization of used toothbrushes by next generation sequencing (NGS) and by cultivation on different media. Furthermore, we determined the occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and the impact of different bristle materials on microbial growth and survival. NGS data revealed that Enterobacteriaceae, Micrococcaceae, Actinomycetaceae, and Streptococcaceae comprise major parts of the toothbrush microbiome. The composition of the microbiome differed depending on the period of use or user age. While higher fractions of Actinomycetales, Lactobacillales, and Enterobacterales were found after shorter periods, Micrococcales dominated on both toothbrushes used for more than four weeks and on toothbrushes of older users, while in-vitro tests revealed increasing counts of Micrococcus on all bristle materials as well. Compared to other environments, we found a rather low frequency of ARGs. We determined bacterial counts between 1.42 × 106 and 1.19 × 107 cfu/toothbrush on used toothbrushes and no significant effect of different bristles materials on bacterial survival or growth. Our study illustrates that toothbrushes harbor various microorganisms and that both period of use and user age might affect the microbial composition.

Ecological Effects of Daily Antiseptic Treatment on Microbial Composition of Saliva-Grown Microcosm Biofilms and Selection of Resistant Phenotypes

“…Apart from these typical oral taxa, Enterobacteriaceae could be isolated from the biofilms from donors 2 and 4. Although members of Enterobacteriaceae are usually considered as transient components of the oral microbiota, they have consistently been detected at low numbers in subgingival biofilm samples ( Espíndola et al, 2022 ; Jepsen et al, 2022 ) and also on toothbrushes ( Zinn et al, 2020 ). For instance, Jepsen et al (2022) recently analyzed biofilm samples collected between 2008 and 2015 from deep periodontal pockets in 16,612 German adults diagnosed with periodontitis and found mean annual prevalence rates of 3.6% for K. oxytoca and 2.5% for E. cloacae .…”

Effect of Dextranase and Dextranase-and-Nisin-Containing Mouthwashes on Oral Microbial Community of Healthy Adults—A Pilot Study

“…2022, 12, 1650 2 of 20 tract infections, arthritis, cystic fibrosis, and brain disease [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Even though brushing and flossing can be effective methods of removing plaque, toothbrushes can operate as reservoirs for harmful germs that later inoculate the oral cavity, highlighting the need to properly sanitize and store personal dental hygiene devices [10][11][12][13].…”

The role of toothbrush in the transmission of corona- and influenza viruses — results of an in vitro study

“…Generally, the toothbrush has been examined as a potential source of microorganisms in different studies, including both bacterial and fungal species [ 5 – 8 ]. While toothbrushes are commonly used for daily oral hygiene, their potential risk as a source of infection opens a new view on a potentially neglected health risk [ 9 , 10 ].…”