2018
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnx294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Topology of Compact Lie Group Actions Through the Lens of Finite Models

Abstract: Abstract. Given a compact, connected Lie group K, we use principal K-bundles to construct manifolds with prescribed finite-dimensional algebraic models. Conversely, let M be a compact, connected, smooth manifold which supports an almost free K-action. Under a partial formality assumption on the orbit space and a regularity assumption on the characteristic classes of the action, we describe an algebraic model for M with commensurate finiteness and partial formality properties. The existence of such a model has … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we will sometimes avoid mentioning the coefficient field when referring to these formality notions. The descent property for partial formality from Theorem 1.2, part (1) has been used in [62] to establish the (n − 1)-formality over Q of compact Sasakian manifolds of dimension 2n + 1.…”
Section: Formality Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we will sometimes avoid mentioning the coefficient field when referring to these formality notions. The descent property for partial formality from Theorem 1.2, part (1) has been used in [62] to establish the (n − 1)-formality over Q of compact Sasakian manifolds of dimension 2n + 1.…”
Section: Formality Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude with one more class of spaces and maps where Corollary 6.5 applies. 28 STEFAN PAPADIMA AND ALEXANDER I. SUCIU Proposition 6.8. Let f : X Ñ X 1 be a pq´1q-connected map between q-finite, pointed spaces, for some q ě 1.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The inclusion (1.6) is an equality, for some convenient compactification of M. This theorem, which will be proved in § 7.2, provides a topological interpretation for [22,Question 8.4], which asks whether statement (4) from above always holds.…”
Section: Topological Versus Infinitesimal Factorizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote by ϕ : H → A the canonical cdga inclusion. Note that both H and A are cdgas with positive weights, preserved by the map ϕ; see [22,Proposition 9.1].…”
Section: Rank Greater Thanmentioning
confidence: 99%