1982
DOI: 10.3758/bf03203275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words

Abstract: Imagery and concreteness norms and percentage noun usage were obtained on the 1,080 verbal items from the Toronto Word Pool. Imagery was defined as the rated ease with which a word aroused a mental image, and concreteness was defined in relation to level of abstraction. The degree to which a word was functionally a noun was estimated in a sentence generation task. The mean and standard deviation of the imagery and concreteness ratings for each item are reported together with letter and printed frequency counts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
255
0
10

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
255
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed no significant effects of age, gender or education level on imageability or frequency ratings (Table 2). Our results are consistent with previous research that failed to find gender bias in imageability ratings, including one study of 1,599 Norwegian words (56% nouns, 30% verbs and 14% adjectives) , a study involving 244 Spanish words (Campos, 1990), and a study involving 1,080 English words (Friendly et al, 1982). On the other hand, our results contrast with two studies demonstrating that women rate imageability significantly higher than men do; one of those studies involved 1,046 words randomly chosen from the Oxford English Dictionary (Benjafield & Muckenheim, 1989), and the other study involved 4,905 Polish words (Imbir, 2016).…”
Section: Relationship Of Imageability and Frequency To Rater Gender supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Results showed no significant effects of age, gender or education level on imageability or frequency ratings (Table 2). Our results are consistent with previous research that failed to find gender bias in imageability ratings, including one study of 1,599 Norwegian words (56% nouns, 30% verbs and 14% adjectives) , a study involving 244 Spanish words (Campos, 1990), and a study involving 1,080 English words (Friendly et al, 1982). On the other hand, our results contrast with two studies demonstrating that women rate imageability significantly higher than men do; one of those studies involved 1,046 words randomly chosen from the Oxford English Dictionary (Benjafield & Muckenheim, 1989), and the other study involved 4,905 Polish words (Imbir, 2016).…”
Section: Relationship Of Imageability and Frequency To Rater Gender supporting
confidence: 82%
“…To our knowledge, there are no large collections of concreteness ratings, but imageability norms were collected by Van Loon-Vervoorn (1985) for 6,100 words. The correlations between concreteness and imageability reported in the literature range from 0.78 to 0.85 (Friendly, Franklin, Hoffmann, & Rubin, 1982;Gilhooly & Logie, 1980;Paivio, Yuille, & Madigan, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experiment 1 used words from the Toronto word pool (Friendly et al, 1982), but many of these words are disyllabic, and we thought that we might maximise the chance of observing participants' rehearsals if common monosyllabic words were used. Finally, the words were presented visually (without AS) and the participants were required to read aloud each word as it was presented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials consisted of a subset of 528 words that were randomly selected for each participant from the 1,000 words of the Toronto Word Pool (Friendly, Franklin, Hoffman & Rubin, 1982). The words were presented visually in 52-point Times New…”
Section: Materials and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%