2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The total synthesis of (+)-elaeokanidine A: natural product or isolation artefact?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors noted that the conditions employed for the conversion of grandisine D ( 105 ) to grandisine B ( 106 ) were extremely close to the conditions used during the isolation and therefore questioned if grandisine B ( 106 ) was an artefact generated during the isolation process rather than a natural product. Similar concerns were raised during the total synthesis of (+)-elaeokanidine A ( 108 ), a structurally related indolizidine natural product, originating from the same plant family as grandisine B and D. 41 In contrast to Taylor’s previously developed approach, the synthetic route proceeded through phenylthioalkyne 102 , which allowed conversion of carbonyl–alkyne metathesis product 104 to enone 107 in 83% yield via a Liebeskind-Srogl coupling. Treatment of 107 with aqueous ammonia resulted in the expected double conjugate addition and provided a mixture of three isomers in 51% combined yield.…”
Section: Carbonyl–alkyne Metathesismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the authors noted that the conditions employed for the conversion of grandisine D ( 105 ) to grandisine B ( 106 ) were extremely close to the conditions used during the isolation and therefore questioned if grandisine B ( 106 ) was an artefact generated during the isolation process rather than a natural product. Similar concerns were raised during the total synthesis of (+)-elaeokanidine A ( 108 ), a structurally related indolizidine natural product, originating from the same plant family as grandisine B and D. 41 In contrast to Taylor’s previously developed approach, the synthetic route proceeded through phenylthioalkyne 102 , which allowed conversion of carbonyl–alkyne metathesis product 104 to enone 107 in 83% yield via a Liebeskind-Srogl coupling. Treatment of 107 with aqueous ammonia resulted in the expected double conjugate addition and provided a mixture of three isomers in 51% combined yield.…”
Section: Carbonyl–alkyne Metathesismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Total synthesis of grandisine B ( 106 ) and D ( 105 ) and elaeokanidine A ( 108 ) (Taylor and co-workers, 2011 and 2015). 4041 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of the desired hydroazulenone 8 was detected. Alternatively, attempting to use a formic acid-promoted cyclization 60,61 between the thioalkyne and the acetal motifs in compound 9 returned only messy mixtures. It was postulated that the desired cyclization was prevented by the steric bulk at C-8 (caldaphnidine J numbering).…”
Section: Retrosynthetic Analysis As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid-catalyzed metathesis of an alkyne and an aldehyde suitably positioned within one molecular framework is a useful way to make synthetically useful carbo- or heterocycles . Despite many reaction conditions developed for inter- and intramolecular alkyne carbonyl metathesis (ACM), to the best of our knowledge, only a few examples where ACM is applied to the total synthesis of natural products have been disclosed . As shown in Scheme a, we recently demonstrated highly efficient assembly of 3-acylchromene 2 from 1 by this protocol in the course of our total synthesis of brazilin .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%