2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada460529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Total Variation Regularized L1 Model for Multiscale Decomposition

Abstract: Abstract. This paper studies the total variation regularization model with an L 1 fidelity term (TV-L 1 ) for decomposing an image into features of different scales. We first show that the images produced by this model can be formed from the minimizers of a sequence of decoupled geometry subproblems. Using this result we show that the TV-L 1 model is able to separate image features according to their scales, where the scale is analytically defined by the G-value. A number of other properties including the geom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that only rough boundary locations are required for this step. First, a total variation (TV) regularized L 1 model-based decomposition [17] with regularization parameter λ = 0.01 is used to remove high-frequency details like speckle noise, but preserves information regarding location of the inner wall boundary (Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that only rough boundary locations are required for this step. First, a total variation (TV) regularized L 1 model-based decomposition [17] with regularization parameter λ = 0.01 is used to remove high-frequency details like speckle noise, but preserves information regarding location of the inner wall boundary (Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldfarb and Yin [40] first reformulated this TV-regularized problem into a second-order cone programming (SOCP) setting, and the efficient interior point methods can produce an accurate solution at a polynomial computing cost. This approach has been widely used in image processing and analysis [40]–[42]. However, because the system matrix size is typically enormous in the CT field, an alternating minimization algorithm is usually chosen to solve the TV-regularized problem.…”
Section: Methodlogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient flow for p = 1 and total variation in the continuum is related to the L 1 -TV model, which appears to have interesting multiscale properties (cf. [54]). A challenging problem is the numerical computation of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in the nonlinear setup, which is the case also in the general case beyond the spectral clustering application.…”
Section: Cheeger Sets and Spectral Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%