This article explores the practice and political significance of politicians' journeys to conflict zones. It focuses on the German example looking at field trips to theatres of international intervention as a way of first-hand knowing in policymaking. Paying tribute to Lisa Smirl and her thought-provoking work on humanitarian spaces, objects and imaginaries and on liminality in aid worker biographies, two connected arguments are developed. First, through the exploration of the routinised practices of politicians' field trips I show how these journeys not only remain confined to the 'auxiliary space' of aid/intervention, but that it is furthermore a staged reality of this auxiliary space that most politicians experience on their journeys. Based on this, I then ask, second, what politicians actually do experience on their journeys and how their experiences relate to their policy knowledge about conflict and intervention. I show that political field trips enable sensory/affectual, liminoid and liminal 2 experiences, which have functions such as authority accumulation, agenda setting, community building, and civilisation in domestic politics, while at the same time reinforcing, in most cases, pre-existing conflict and intervention imaginaries.